期刊文献+

浅析归因引起的安全感偏差 被引量:2

Analysis on the deviation of sense of security inspired by attribution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 安全与安全感是两个不同的概念,安全是客观存在的状态,安全感是行为主体认为所处的状态是安全的。安全感在工作与日常生活中对个体行为的安全性发挥着重要作用,而个体的归因行为对安全感的判断产生巨大影响。应用归因理论,通过分析生产与日常生活中的典型案例,说明归因行为引起的安全感判断偏差所带来的危害,以从一个新的角度引起人们的重视;最后根据分析结果针对性地提出建议措施。总之,在从事行为活动时,人们必须增强安全意识,通过正确归因获得有益的安全感,以避免或减轻由于归因引起的安全感偏差而带来的危害。 The concepts of safety and sense of safety are different:Safety is a kind of state which exists objectively and sense of security is the state that people feel safe.In fact,sense of security plays a key role in individual safe behaviors in the daily life.Moreover,during the process of inspiring sense of security,attribution of individual behaviors has a great effect on people's judgment.By analyzing some typical instances,attribution theory was applied to explain the damage caused by deviation of sense of safety inspired by attribution,to attract people's attention from a new perspective.At last,some targeted recommendations were proposed.To sum up,in order to avoid or reduce the damage caused by deviation of sense of security inspired by attribution,people should strengthen awareness of safety and form the correct attribution to gain the beneficial sense of security.
作者 林亮
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS 2012年第10期204-207,共4页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
关键词 安全感 归因 偏差 sense of security attribution deviation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1林泽炎.不同矿工对事故发生影响因素的归因[J].安全,1997,18(1):1-4. 被引量:2
  • 2安全感--百度百科.http://baike.baidu.corn/view/182051.htm.
  • 3张钢,曹评.基于归因理论的冲突类型分析[J].管理评论,2010,22(3):86-92. 被引量:12
  • 4曹倩琴.浅析归因理论发展及影响[J].景德镇高专学报,2010,25(3):38-40. 被引量:4
  • 5Fritz Heider. The psychology of interpersonal relations [M]. New York: Wiley, 1958.
  • 6Harold H. Kelley, Attribution in social interaction[ M. New York: General Learning Press, 1971.
  • 7Bernard Weiner. Theories of motivation: From mecha- nism to cognition[ M]. Chicago: Markham, 1972.
  • 8Bernard Weiner. An attributional theory of motivation and emotion[ M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
  • 9CB11567.1-2001.汽车和挂车侧面防护要求[s],2001.
  • 10GBll567.2-2001.汽车和挂车后下部防护要求[S],2001.

二级参考文献33

  • 1林钟敏.责任的心理分析──介绍B.韦纳新著《责任的判断》[J].心理科学进展,1996,6(3):56-60. 被引量:15
  • 2De Dreu, C.K.W. and L.R. Weingart, Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88(4):741-749.
  • 3Jehn, K.A. and C. Bendersky. Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A Contingency Perspective on the Conflict-outcome Relationship[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2003,25:187-243.
  • 4Amason, A.C., Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(1):123-148.
  • 5Amason, A.C. and H.J. Sapienza. The Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict[J]. Journal of Management, 1997,23(4):495.
  • 6Jehn, K.A. A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2):256-282.
  • 7Jehn, K.A. A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(3):530-557.
  • 8Amason, A. and D. Schweiger. Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance [J]. International Journal of Conflict Management 1994, 5:239-253.
  • 9Jehn, K.A., G.B. Northcraft, and M.A. Neale. Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(4):741-763.
  • 10Simons, T., L.H. Pelled, and K.A. Smith. Making Use of Difference: Diversity, Debate, and Decision Comprehensiveness in Top Management Teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(6):662-673.

共引文献16

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部