1Hara T, Yamada S, Hayashi T, et al. Aeeuraey of nonstenotic coronaryatherosclerosis assessment by multi-detector computed tomogram Phy. Ci-rej,2007 ,71 :911-914.
2Pflederer T,Schmid M,RoPers D,et al. Interobserver variability of 64-sliecomputed tomography for the quantiiieation ofnon-ealeified eoronary ath-erosclerotic plaque. Rofo,2007,179 :953-957.
3Onuma Y, TanabeK, Chihara R, et al. Evaluation of eoronarytirtery byPass graftsandnative eoronaiy arteriesusing 64-sliee multideteetor compu-ted tomography. Am Heart J,2007 ,154 :519-526.
4Ong K, Chin SP, Chan WL, et al. Feasibility and aeeuraey of 64- rowMDCT eoronary imaging from a centre with early experience : areview andeomparison with established centres. Med Malaysia, 2005,60 : 629-636.
3Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kanao S, et al. Coronary angi- ography by 64 detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2007, 31(2): 272-280.
4Kondo M, Nagao M, Yonezawa M, et al. Improvement of automated right ventricular segmentation using dual bolus contrast media injection with 256-slice coronary CT angiogra phy[J]. AcadRadiol, 2014, 21(5): 648-653.
5Zhang LJ, Qi L, Wang J, Tang CX, et al. Feasibility of pro- spectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 ml iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experi- ence [J]. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(7) : 1537-1546.
