摘要
从占地面积、工艺流程、造价、运行费用等方面对液压式CNG加气子站和压缩机增压式CNG加气子站进行了比较,推荐采用前者。
The hydraulic CNG secondary filling station and compressor boosting CNG secondary filling station are compared in terms of floor area, process flow, construction cost and operation cost. The former is recommended.
出处
《煤气与热力》
2012年第11期3-6,共4页
Gas & Heat
关键词
汽车加气子站
液压式加气子站
压缩机
液压橇
vehicle secondary filling station
hydraulic secondary filling station
compressor
hydraulic skid
