2Carson R T, Mitchell R C. The Value of Clean Water: the Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable, Fishable and Swimmable Quality Water. Water Resources Research, 1993, 29: 2445-2454.
3Seip K, Strand J. Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: a Contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment. Environmental and Resource Economics 1992, 2(1): 91-106.
4Navrud S. Willingness to Pay for Preservation of Species-an Experiment with Actual Payments. In: Navrud. Pricing the European Environment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.6-58.
5Hanemann W M. Theory Versus Data in the Contingent Valuation Debate. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 38-60.
6Kahneman D. Comments on the Contingent Valuation Method. In: Cummings R G, Brookshire D S, Schulze W D. Valuing Environmental Goods: a State of Arts Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Roweman and Allanheld, 1986. 185-194.
7Baron J. Rationality and Invariance: Response to Schuman. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 145-166.
8Fisher A C. The Conceptual Underpinnings of the Contingent Valuation Method. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 19-37.
9Carson R T. Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope. In: Kopp R J, Pommerhene W, Schwartz N. Determining the Value of Non-marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods. Boston: Kluwer, 1997. 127-163.
10Shogren J F, Shin S Y, Hayes D J, et al. Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept. American Economic Review, 1994, 84: 255-269.
