摘要
安全保障义务的合理限定是平衡健身活动双方当事人利益的平衡点。《侵权责任法》第37条虽然规定公共场所管理人负有安全保障义务,但未对安全保障义务的具体内容进行明确规定,导致健身活动中人身伤害侵权责任难以认定与法律适用困难。只有明确公共场所安全保障义务的具体内容,才能真正保护健身公众的合法权益,实现公共服务的社会责任。
Reasonable limit of the safety assurance obligations is the equilibrium point of both parties in fitness ac tivities.Though Article 37 of Tort Act of China provides for the safety assurance obligations of the manager of public places,but not clearly defined the specific content of the safety assurance obligations,result that tort liability is hardly to identified and the Tort Act is difficult to be applied for the personal injury in fitness activities.Only clearly defined the specific content of the safety assurance obligations,in order to truly protect the legitimate rights and in terests of the victim and achieve to social responsibility of the public services.
出处
《武汉体育学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第10期35-38,共4页
Journal of Wuhan Sports University
基金
2010年河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2010FFX012)
关键词
健身活动
人身伤害
安全保障义务
责任认定
法律适用
fitness activity
personal injury
safety assurance obligation
responsibility identified
application of law