期刊文献+

国际政治权力的特质及其启示——与国内政治相比较的分析 被引量:1

Particular Characteristics of International Power and Their Implications——with a Comparative Analysis of Domestic Politics
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际政治学的"权力论",或是把权力作为一种社会关系的一般性含义应用到国际政治中来,或是移用国内政治的权力理论,两者都没有顾及权力在国际关系中的特殊性,因而未能揭示出国际政治权力的特质。通过与国内政治相比较的分析,可以发现,国际政治中的国家权力在类型上是一种私有权力,在价值取向上是国家个体利益,在行使上是相对自由的,在属性上并不是政治权力。这些特质启示我们,在学科建设上,国际政治学在借鉴别的学科理论时,要注意消化吸收,笔者建议创设"国际权力"概念,以与国内政治权力概念相区别。在国际政治的界定上,权力的差异决定了国际政治是与国内政治并行的另外一种形态的政治,这一点也引出了国际政治学科的独立性问题。 The power theory of international politics applies power with its general meaning of social relations, or mistakenly explains its meaning by referring to the domestic political theory. Both fail to reveal the particular characteristics of international political power, for they do not take into account the particularity of power in international relations. A comparative study with domestic politics establishes the fact that in essence the state power is not a political power. In the field of international politics it is classified as a private power which centers round the inter- ests of individual states with relatively free operation. These traits imply that in the development of the discipline "international politics", attention should be paid to digestion and absorption when borrowing theories from other disciplines. The authors suggest that a concept of "interna- tional power" be created in order to differentiate it from domestic political power. When defining international politics, the differences in power determine that international politics is another form of politics which parallels domestic politics. This also raises the issue of establishing inter- national politics as an independent discipline.
作者 戴轶 吕彬
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第11期87-93,共7页 Teaching and Research
关键词 国家权力 国际政治 国内政治 state power international politics domestic politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1[美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂 小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫著 阎学通 陈寒溪.争论中的国际关系理论[M].北京:世界知识出版,2003..
  • 2Robert Lieber. Theory and World Polities[M]. South Carlina: Winthrop Publisher, 1972.
  • 3倪世雄等.当代西方国际关系理论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004.
  • 4Talcott Parsons. Power and the Social System [A]. in Steven Lukes, ed.. Power[C]. New York: New York University Press, 1986.
  • 5Karl W. Deutsch The Analysis of International Relations[M]. 3nd ed.. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. : Prentice-Hall, 1988.
  • 6Mark R. Amstutz. International Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to World Polities [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill College, 1999.
  • 7David A. Baldwin. Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics[A]. in David A. Baldwin, ed.. Neorealism and Neoliberalism:The Contemporary Debate [C]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
  • 8Stanley Hoffmann. Contemporary Theory in International Relations[M]. New York: Englewood Cliff, 1960.
  • 9Inis L. Claude, Jr.. Power and International Relations[M]. New York: Random House, 1962.
  • 10[意]安东尼奥·卡塞斯.国际法[M].蔡从燕,等译.北京:法律出版社,2009.

共引文献104

同被引文献35

  • 1戴平辉.结构性权力下的美国霸权[J].太平洋学报,2004,12(1):38-47. 被引量:8
  • 2Susan Strange, States and Markets, London. Pinter Publishers, 1988, pp.24-28, 45, 64, 90, 121.
  • 3Susan Strange, States and Markets, p.139.
  • 4Susan Strange, States and Markets, pp.165, 185.
  • 5Andreas Dur, "Bargaining Power and Trade Liberalization. European External Trade Policies in the 1960s," European Journal oflnternational Relations, Vol.14, No.4, 2008, pp.661-662.
  • 6Joan E. Twiggs, The Tokyo Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations . A Case Study in Building Domestic Support for Diplomacy, New York . University Press of America, 1987, p. 122.
  • 7Stephen D. Krasner, "The Tokyo Round. Particularistic Interests and Prospects for Stability in the Global Trading System," International Studies Quarterly, Vol.23, No.4, 1979, pp.492-493.
  • 8Amrita Narlikar, "New Powers in the Club . The Challenges of Global Trade Governance," International Affairs, Vol.86, No.3, 2010, pp.720-721.
  • 9Ann Capling and John Ravenhill, "Multilateralising Regionalism . What Role for the Trans-Pacific Part- nership Agreement?" The Pacifw Review, Vol.24, No.5, 2011, p.559.
  • 10Susan Strange, "The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony," International Organization, Vol.41, No.4, 1987, p.569.

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部