摘要
不同于逻辑学中的叙述三段论,司法三段论中的大前提——法律规范不是对客观事实的简单描摹,而是蕴含价值取向的伦理命题。在一般情形下,法官只需以该价值尺度去评价并拣选案件事实,即可得出公正之判决。但当法律规范与社会共识发生重大冲突时,法官便不得不重新进行价值取舍,并通过巧妙的修辞技艺使其判词既符合现有的逻辑体系,又以最俭省的方式让当事人及公众理解与接受。
Different from narrative syllogism in logic, the major premise, that is the norm of law, in judicial syllogism, is not a simple description about objective facts, but an ethic thesis underlying value orientation. Just abiding by this value orientation, judges can evaluate and select facts and bring in a fair verdict generally. However, when there's a grave conflict between the norm of law and social common views, judges have to make a new choice of values, and try to accord his decision with existing norm logically and convince parties in action and the public economically through crafty rhetoric.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第11期13-23,共11页
Intellectual Property
基金
国家社科基金重点项目:<中国特色知识产权理论体系研究>(项目编号:11XNQ068)阶段性研究成果
关键词
司法裁量
价值判断
著作权
修辞
judicial decision
value judgment
copyright
rhetoric