期刊文献+

PSI评分和CURB-65评分对社区获得性肺炎患者病情及预后的对比研究 被引量:16

Clinical study between PSI and CUR-65 score in assessment of condition and prognosis in community acquired pneumonia patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究PSI评分和CURB-65评分对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者病情及预后评估的价值。方法选取本院急诊留观病房2010年1~12月收治的111例CAP患者,24h内完成相关数据采集,4周后为观察终点,预后为观测指标。对比研究两种评分系统判断CAP病情及预后的灵敏性、特异性。结果两种评分系统均显示低、中危组的死亡率较高危组明显降低:PSI低、高危组分别为2.7%和62.2%,CURB-65低、中、高危组分别为4.3%、16.2%、63.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两种评分系统判断CAP预后的敏感性分别为92%、68%,特异性分别为83.7%、88.4%,阳性预测值分别为62.2%、63.0%,阴性预测值分别为97.3%、95.0%。结论 PSI和CURB-65评分系统均能准确反映CAP患者的病情严重程度和判断预后,对于预测患者为"非高危"者可以认为预后良好。PSI评分的敏感性高,阴性预测值高,且评分系统相对更复杂,适合病房应用。CURB-65评分敏感性相对低,特异性高,阴性预测值高,且评分系统相对简单,有利于筛选出高危患者进行加强治疗和监护,适合在门、急诊使用。 Objective To study the valuation of PSI and CURB-65 Score in assessment of condition and prognosis in com munity acquired pneumonia patients.Methods Patients selected from the ICU of emergency department in the the First People's Hospital of Changde City from January to December 2010,111 cases which were suspected of having CAP were chosen.The patients were recorded PSI and CURB-65 within 24 hours after admission.The 28th day of admission to hospital was regarded as the observation terminal and the outcomes as the observation.PSI and CURB-65 were evaluated at the sensitivity,specificity in assessment of condition and prognosis in community acquired pneumonia patients.Results The two score systems showed that the mortality of the low-risk or moderate-risk group was significantly lower than highrisk group:2.7% vs 62.2% for PSI,4.3% vs 16.2% vs 63.0% for CURB-65 (all P 0.05).The sensitivity were 92% and 68% in CAP using PSI and CURB-65,their specificity were 83.7% and 88.4%,respectively.Their positive predictive rates were 62.2% and 63.0%,respectively.Their negative predictive rates were 97.3% and 95.0%,respectively.Conclusion The two score systems can accurately reflect the condition of severity and prognosis in community acquired pneumonia patients.That the prognosis is good prediction in patients with non-high-risk.The sensitivity and negative predictive rates of PSI Score are higher and more complicated than CUR-65.So PSI Score is suitable for use in ward.The sensitivity of CURB65 is lower than PSI,but the specificity and negative predictive rates are higher than PSI.In regard to easy handle and instant filter out the patients of poor prognosis for strengthening treatment and guardianship,CURB-65 is the favorable prog nostic score and suitable for use in out-patient department and emergency room.
作者 但勇 覃双全
出处 《中国当代医药》 2012年第21期29-30,32,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 PSI评分 CURB-65评分 社区获得性肺炎 预后 PSI Score CURB-65 Score Community acquired pneumonia Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Jackson MI, Neuzi! KM ,Thompson WW ,et al. The burden of community- acquired pheumonia in seniors: results of a population-based study[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2004,39 ( 11 ) : 1642-1650.
  • 2Zalacain R,Tones A,Celis R,et al. Community-acquired pneumonia inthe elderly:Spanish rnuhicentre study [J]. Eur Respir J,2003,21 ( 2 ) : 294-302.
  • 3社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):651-655. 被引量:3032
  • 4Fine MJ,Smith MA,Carson CA,et al. Prognosis and outcomes of pa- tients with community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 1996,275 (2) : 134-141.
  • 5lbarra V ,Laffoon TA ,Snyder M ,et al. Clinical pathways in the perioper- ative setting[J]. Nuts Case Manag, 1997,3(2) :97-106.
  • 6Lim WS,Van der Eerden MM,Laing R, et al. Defining community ac- quired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital:an international derivation and validation study[J]. Thorax, 2003,5 (2):377-382.
  • 7Schaaf B,Kruse J,Rupp J, et al. Sepsis severity predicts outcome in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia[J]. Eur Respir J ,2007,3 (1) :517-524.

二级参考文献24

  • 1沈定霞,罗燕萍,崔岩,赵莉萍,白立彦.分离产金属β-内酰胺酶的铜绿假单胞菌[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2004,14(1):86-88. 被引量:109
  • 2刘又宁,陈民钧,赵铁梅,王辉,王睿,刘庆锋,蔡柏蔷,曹彬,孙铁英,胡云建,修清玉,周新,丁星,杨岚,卓建生,唐英春,张扣兴,梁德荣,吕晓菊,李胜歧,刘勇,俞云松,魏泽庆,应可净,赵峰,陈萍,侯晓娜.中国城市成人社区获得性肺炎665例病原学多中心调查[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(1):3-8. 被引量:784
  • 3Ngeow YF,Suwanjutha S,Chantarojanasriri T,et al.An Asian study on the prevalence of atypical respiratory pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia.Int J Infect Dis,2005,9:144-153.
  • 4de Roux A,Marcos MA,Garcia E,et al.Viral community-acquired pneumonia in nonimmunocompromised adults.Chest,2004,125:1343-1351.
  • 5Ostrosky-Zeichner L,Alexander BD,Kett DH,et al.Multicenter clinical evaluation of the (1→3) beta-D-glucan assay as an aid to diagnosis of fungal infections in humans.Clin Infect Dis,2005,41:654-659.
  • 6Food and Drug Administration,HHS.Class Ⅱ Special Controls Guidance Document:serological assays for the detection of betaglucan.Fed Reqist,2004,69:56934-56936.
  • 7Mandell LA,Marrie TJ,Grossman RF,et al.Canadian guidelines for the initial management of community-acquired pneumonia:an evidence-based update by the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society.The Canadian CommunityAcquired Pneumonia Working Group.Clin Infect Dis,2000,31:383-421.
  • 8Woodhead M,Blasi F,Ewig S,et al.Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections.Eur Respir J,2005,26:1138-1180.
  • 9Mandell LA,Bartlett JG,Dowell SF,et al.Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults.Clin Infect Dis,2003,37:1405-1433.
  • 10Fine MJ,Auble TE,Yealy DM,et al.A prediction rule to identify low risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.N Engl J Med,1997,336:243-250.

共引文献3031

同被引文献129

引证文献16

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部