摘要
目的 30例剥脱性骨软骨炎的手术与保守治疗对比分析探讨。方法选取该院骨科2009年3月—2012年2月收治的60例患有剥脱性骨软骨炎的患者,随机分成两组,对照组采用较保守的植骨加钢丝内固定法进行治疗;治疗组采用肘关节镜下手术治疗。结果根据Mayo肘关节评分治疗组优良率高于保守疗法,经比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论关节镜下手术相对于保守疗法,对剥脱性骨软骨炎的治疗有切口小、操作简便、安全、患者痛苦小、疗效好等方面优点。
Objective 30 cases of osteochondritis dissecans of surgical and conservative treatment of comparative analysis.Methods My hospital orthopedic March 2009 to February 2012 60 patients with osteochondritis dissecans of the patients were randomly divided into two groups,the comparison group using the more conservative of the graft and wire fixation for treatment;treatment group elbow endoscopic surgery.Results According to the Mayo elbow score good rate of treatment group on conservative treatment,by comparison,the difference was statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion Arthroscopic surgery compared to conservative therapy,the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans incision is small,easy to operate,safe,pain patients,good effect,advantages.
出处
《中外医疗》
2012年第29期20-20,22,共2页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
剥脱性骨软骨炎
手术治疗
保守治疗
Osteochondritis dissecans
Surgery
Conservative treatment
