期刊文献+

冠心病患者住院期间实施整体护理的效果探讨 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨冠心病患者的整体护理措施,观察其临床疗效,评价其应用价值。方法对2010年10月—2011年10月在该院进行治疗的84例冠心病患者随机分为两组,其中对照组(42例)和观察组(42例),两组患者均采用介入疗法进行治疗,同时在治疗后对患者采取相应的护理措施,对照组患者采用常规护理方法,观察组患者采用整体护理,对两组患者的恢复及预后情况进行比较。结果总有效率:观察组和对照组的总有效率分别为95.23%和76.19%,观察组有效率好于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);患者满意度:观察组患者满意度是92.9%,对照组患者满意度是85.7%,观察组患者的满意度好于对照组,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);并发症:观察组患者出现静脉溶栓症的有4例,占9.5%,对照组患者出现静脉溶栓症的有9例,占21.4%,观察组患者发生静脉溶栓少于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对冠心病患者在进行介入治疗后采取整体护理措施,不仅可以改善患者的恢复情况,缩短住院时间,同时能够降低并发症的发生,提高患者的满意度,具有很好的临床应用价值。
作者 王淑梅
出处 《中外医疗》 2012年第29期162-163,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1高润霖.正确应用冠状动脉内支架植入术[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):330-331. 被引量:85
  • 2[1]Batchelor WB, Anstrom K J, Muhlbaier LH, et al.Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7 472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,36: 723-730.
  • 3[2]Klein LW, Block P, Brindis RG, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry: development of a nomogram predictive of in-hospital mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, 40: 394-402.
  • 4[3]The TIME investigators. Trial of Invasive versus Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients with Chronic Symptomatic Coronary-artery Disease (TIME): a randomised trial. Lancet, 2001, 358:951-957.
  • 5[4]Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, et al. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation, 2002,105 : 2378-2384.
  • 6[5]de Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, van't Hof AWJ, et al. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, 39:1723-1728.
  • 7[6]DeGeare VS, Stone GW, Grines L, et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics associated with increased inhospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous intervention (a pooled analysis of the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trials). Am J Cardiol, 2000, 86: 30-34.
  • 8[7]Minai K, Horie H, Takahashi M, et al. Long-term outcome of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for low-risk acute myocardial infarction in patients older than 80 years: a single-center, open, randomized trial. Am Heart J, 2002,143: 497-505.
  • 9[8]Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock.JAMA, 2001, 285:190-192.
  • 10[9]Chauhan MS, Kuntz RE, Ho KL, et al. Coronary artery stenting in the aged. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001, 37: 856-862.

共引文献23

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部