明清以来关于黄道周易学的评论

Reviews on Huang Daozhou's Yi Study since the Ming and Qing Dynasties

黄道周是明末易学的重要代表人物,其易学具有综合性、原创性、体系性、实践性等特色,在中国易学史上罕见而少人能解,明清以来褒贬不一。李世熊、方以智、黄宗羲、孙奇逢等人对黄道周的易学给予了很高的肯定,但李光地等对其特别是《三易洞玑》有诸多批评。总体来看,《易象正》正面肯定较多,《三易洞玑》负面批评较多。《四库全书》把《易象正》收入经部易类,把《三易洞玑》收入子部术数类,并给予中肯的评价,应该说基本上代表了学界主流对黄道周易学的看法。

Huang Daozhou was the important representative in the field of Yi study in Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty, whose Yi study involved characteristics such as comprehensiveness, originality, systematization, and practicability etc. Given that this sort of study was rare and abstruse in the history of Chinese Yi studies, the related reviews since the Ming and Qing Dynasties were divided into two parties： exponents and detractors. Li Shixiong, Fang Yizhi, Huang Zongxi, Sun Qifeng and the like thought highly of Huang Daozhou＇s Yi study. However, scholars like Li Guangdi criticized a lot especially on Huang＇s San Yi Dong Ji. On the whole, reviewers gave more positive comments to Yi Xiang Zheng, but San Yi Dong Ji met with much criticism. Yi Xiang Zheng was compiled into Yi class, Jing section in Si Ku Quan Shu, and San Yi Dung Ji was put into Shushu class, Zi section, both of which were pertinently evaluated; the evaluations as such basically represented the views from the main streams of the ac ademia on Huang Daozhou＇s Yi study.