期刊文献+

垃圾焚烧设施公众“邻避”态度调查与受偿意愿测算 被引量:14

Public NIMBY Attitude Survey and WTA Estimate of Waste Incineration Facility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用条件价值评估法(CVM),在广州番禺生活垃圾焚烧设施四个选址周围发放调查问卷1 517份,对垃圾焚烧设施周围居民接受设施选址的受偿意愿进行研究。结果表明:垃圾焚烧设施的选址受到公众的普遍关注,居民倾向于拒绝获得经济补偿接受设施选址,选址周围居民的个人年均受偿意愿为5 057.76元,并受居民收入水平、年龄等因素明显影响。可见,垃圾焚烧设施强烈的"邻避效应"非单纯经济补偿政策可以解决,应首先利用科学、规范选址、建设与运营,尽可能降低垃圾焚烧环境风险,构建开放型的公众参与城市固体废物处理处置决策机制与公众环保知识宣传机制等,保证公众对垃圾焚烧信息获取、决策参与和全过程监督,在此基础上,构建体现垃圾运输成本的阶梯式收费机制配合多形式的焚烧设施周围居民生态补偿机制,方能扭转垃圾焚烧设施"邻避效应"为"迎臂效应"。 In this paper, 1 517 questionnaires were distributed in four locations of Panyu district waste incineration facility and residents' wiliness to accept (WTA) was study using CVM method. The results show that the location of waste incineration facility receives attention from the public. Residents tend to refuse win economic compensation to accept facility location, and average annual personal willingness to accept is 5 057.76 Yuan. Residents' income level and age and so on have a significant impact on the WTA. The findings show that ecological compensation alone can't relieve NIMBY emotion. Scientific, standardized location, construction and operation should be used to reduce waste incineration environmental risk, open public urban waste disposal decision making mechanism and public environmental protection knowledge publicity mechanism should be built to ensure public information acquisition, decision-making participation and whole-process supervision. Then, on this basis, garbage charge reflecting transport cost with ecological compensation can turn NIMBY to acceptation.
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第12期174-177,共4页 Ecological Economy
基金 2011年环保公益性行业科研项目"城市固体废物焚烧大气环境污染防控与管理支撑关键技术研究"(2011467001)
关键词 受偿意愿 垃圾焚烧设施 邻避效应 条件价值评估法 willingness to accept waste incineration facility NIMBY CVM
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1金通.垃圾处理产业中的邻避现象探析[J].当代财经,2007(5):78-80. 被引量:47
  • 2乔艳洁,曹婷,唐华.从公共政策角度探析邻避效应[J].郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版),2007,26(1):93-94. 被引量:46
  • 3GroothuisP A, Miller G. Locating Hazardous Waste Facilities: theInfluence of NIMBY Beliefs [J]. American Journal of Economics andSociology, 1994, 53 (3): 335-347.
  • 4KunreutherH, Easterling D. The Role of Compensation in SittingHazardous Facilities [J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,1996,15(4): 601-622.
  • 5EllottS J,Taylor S M, Hampson C, et al. It’s not Because You LikeIt any Better: Resident’s Reappraisal of a Landfill Site [J]. Journal ofEnvironmental Psychology, 1997, 17: 229-241.
  • 6FerreiraS, Gallagher L. Protest Responses and CommunityAttitudes toward Accepting Compensation to Host Waste DisposalInfrastructure [J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27: 638-652.
  • 7丘昌泰.从“邻避效应”到“迎臂效应”:台湾环保抗争的问题与出路[J].政治科学论从,2002,17:33-56.
  • 8谭鸿仁,王俊隆.邻避与风险社会:新店安坑掩埋厂设置的个案分析[J].地理研究,2005,42 (5) : 105-126.
  • 9刘阿荣,石慧莹.社群意识与永续发展:邻避现象及补偿金之分析[J].中国行政评论,2004,13(2):1-32.
  • 10方成贤,董兴玲,龚光辉,姜宗顺,高虹,江晶.垃圾焚烧厂的环境补偿机制探讨[J].环境工程,2009,27(S1):603-605. 被引量:16

二级参考文献16

  • 1赵军,杨凯,邰俊,吴阿娜.上海城市河流生态系统服务的支付意愿[J].环境科学,2005,26(2):5-10. 被引量:79
  • 2吕宁,于骞.公共政策合法性的制约因素及补救措施[J].山东工商学院学报,2005,19(3):10-13. 被引量:4
  • 3[美]查尔斯·沃尔夫.市场或政府-权衡两种不完善的选择[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1994..
  • 4Fischer,F.,1995,Hasardous Waste Policy,Community Movements and the Politics of Nimby:Participatory Risk Assessment in the USA and Canada in F.Fischer&M.Black (eds) Greening Environmental Policy:The Politics of a Sustainable Future,ST.Martin' Press,165-182.
  • 5Michael Valenti,1995,the early days of incineration,Mechanical Engineering,May95,Vol.117,Issue 5,p72-77.
  • 6张震东.托克维尔论民主社会之自由问题,载于戴华,郑晓时主编《正义及相关问题》[M].台北:中研院社科所,1991.
  • 7文森特·奥斯特罗姆,等.美国地方政府[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005:12.
  • 8陈俊宏.永续发展与民主:审议式民主理论初探.东吴政治学报,1998,(9):85-122.
  • 9我国垃圾焚烧"二恶英"控制达到国际先进水平[N].光明日报,2004-09-14.
  • 10薛达元,包浩生,李文华.长白山自然保护区森林生态系统间接经济价值评估[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(3):247-252. 被引量:277

共引文献126

同被引文献238

引证文献14

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部