期刊文献+

髋关节表面置换术的临床应用及疗效 被引量:3

Clinical application and efficacy of hip resurfacing arthroplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]通过对髋关节表面置换术病例的随访及分析,探讨该术式的临床应用及疗效。[方法]自2004年1月~2009年1月之间32例患者32髋施行了金属对金属的髋关节表面置换手术,其中男12例,女20例,平均年龄44.8岁(19~65岁),平均体重指数(BMI)25.2(18.7~33.1),术前诊断为股骨头缺血性坏死13例,髋臼发育不良继发骨关节炎19例。手术所采用的表面置换系统的髋臼侧均为生物型固定,股骨侧均为骨水泥型固定且带有导向柄。术后平均随访56个月(37~75个月)。[结果]1例髋臼发育不良继发骨关节炎男性患者因术后1个月出现股骨颈骨折而改行全髋关节置换术,其余病例至随访结束尚无出现松动、翻修,患者Harris评分较术前有显著提高,髋关节功能恢复良好。[结论]金属对金属髋关节表面置换术具有良好的临床疗效,但必须严格选择手术适应证并规范手术技术。 [ Objective ] To investigate the clinical application and efficacy of hip resurfacing arthroplasty by following-up and analyzing of the hip resurfacing cases. [ Method ] Thirty-two patients with 32 hips were treated with metal on metal hip re- surfacing arthroplasty from Jan. 2004 to Jan. 2009. The study group consisted of twelve men and twenty women with the average age of 44.8 years ( range, 19 - 65 years) and the average BMI of 25.2 ( range, 18.7 - 33.1 ). Thirteen patients were diagnozed as avascular necrosis of femoral head and nineteen patients were diagnozed as osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. The hip resurfacing prosthesis system with cementless acetabular side and stemmed cement femoral side was used in op- eration. The mean follow-up were 56 months ( range, 37 - 75 months). [ Result ] One male patient with osteoarthritis was per- formed with total hip arthroplasty because of fracture of femoral neck at 1 month post-operation, and the other cases had no loos- ening or revision of the prosthesis till the terminal point of follow-up. Harris score was improved significantly and the function of hip recovered well. [ Conclusion ] Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty has good clinical efficacy, and that is based on strict selection of patients and standardized operative technique.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第22期2047-2050,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 股骨头缺血性坏死 骨性关节炎 表面置换 avascular necrosis of femoral head osteoarthritis hip resurfacing arthroplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Duffy GP, Berry D J, Rowland C, et al. Primary uneemented total hip arthroplasty in patients < 40 years old: 10-to 14-year results using first-generation proximally porous-coated implants [ J ]. J Arthroplas- ty,2001,16 : 140 - 144.
  • 2Girard J, Glorion C ,Bonnomet F ,et al. Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years [ J ]. Clin Orthop, 2011,4:1141 - 1147.
  • 3Sieber HP, Rieker CB, Kottig P. Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1999,1:46 -50.
  • 4Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V, et al. Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003,11:2168 -2173.
  • 5Migaud H, Putman S, Krantz N, et al. Cement!ess metal-on-metal ver- sus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years of age:a comparative study with twelve to fourteen-year follow- up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2011,2:137 - 142.
  • 6Amstutz HG, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid sur- face arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004,1:28 -39.
  • 7Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2004,2 : 177 - 184.
  • 8Beaule P,Dorey F,Le Duff M,et al. Risk factors affecting early out- come of metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip in patients 40 years old and younger[ J]. Clin Orthop,2004,418:80 -87.
  • 9Amstutz HC ,Thomas BJ,Jinnah R,et al. Treatment of primary osteo- arthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replace- ment arthroplasty[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1984,2:228 -241.
  • 10Gerdesmeyer L, Gollwitzer H, Bader R, et al. Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing[ J]. Orthopade ,2008,7:650 - 658.

同被引文献19

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部