期刊文献+

构建我国刑事诉讼中的刑事处罚令程序——以简易程序实现方式的多元化为视角

Construction of Criminal Procedure in China Criminal Punishment Procedures——With the Perspective of diversification way of simple procedure realization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑事处罚令程序由法官通过书面审以签发刑事处罚令的方式在短期内结案,对提高轻微刑事案件诉讼效率、优化司法资源配置、保障当事人合法权益意义重大,也是简易程序实现方式多元化最为有益的探讨之一。我国客观真实主义的传统、书面审经验的丰富、量刑建议的规范化、辩护制度的完善均为刑事处罚令程序的构建提供了较为成熟的实践经验与制度环境。我国刑事处罚令程序具体构建的思路是:案件范围限定为判处缓刑、拘役、管制或者罚金的轻微刑事案件为益;启动权应该交给检察机关,法院具有决定权,被告人具有程序否决权;具体审判组织是基层法官独立审判,辅助以有经验的人民陪审员或书记员代为负责前期的审查;在程序救济上,保障当事人的知晓权和处分权,尤其是对被告人判处人身自由刑的时候,更应当及时有效地保障其获得律师辩护人的帮助。 Criminal punishment procedures by the judges through written trial for issue of criminal punishment way in the short term closed,to improve the slight criminal case litigation efficiency,optimize the allocation of judicial resources,protect the legitimate interests of the parties is significant,but also simple procedure realization way is most beneficial to discuss one of plurality.China's tradition of objective real,the experience of written trial,the standardization of recommended sentencing,and the consummation of defense system,provide a more mature experience and system environment for the construction of criminal punishment procedures.China s criminal punishment procedure concrete construction has the following several aspects:The scope of the case should be defined in a suspended sentence,criminal detention,control or fines are minor criminal cases;Start right should be handed over to prosecutors,courts have the power to decide,the defendant has a right of veto procedure;Body tissue is the primary trial judge's independent jurisdiction,hire experienced people juror or clerk is responsible for the review of early generation;In the procedure of relief,we should protect the parties' right to know and the right of disposition,especially for the defendant sentenced to the personal freedom penalty,should be timely and effectively safeguard their right to get help from lawyer.
作者 陈在上
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《行政与法》 2012年第11期110-113,共4页 Administration and Law
基金 国家社科基金一般项目"轻微刑事案件快速办理机制研究"的阶段性成果 项目编号:08BFX073
关键词 刑事处罚令 轻微刑事案件 简易程序 criminal punishment minor criminal cases construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1朗胜.刑事诉讼法修改与使用[M].新华出版社,2012.
  • 2叶肖华.处罚令程序的比较与借鉴[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,31(2):41-45. 被引量:21
  • 3Joachim Herrmann,Bargaining Justice A Bargain for German Criminal Justice?U.PITT.L.REV.755(1992).
  • 4托马斯·魏根特.德国刑事诉讼程序[M].岳礼玲,温小洁译.中国政法大学出版社.2004.
  • 5(德)德肖维茨.最好的辩护[M].唐交东译.法律出版社,1995.

二级参考文献11

  • 1刘星.从量刑建议权的价值取向谈如何开展量刑建议改革[J].法学杂志,2006,27(2):113-116. 被引量:28
  • 2林钰雄.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.226.
  • 3弗洛伊德·菲尼,约阿希姆·赫尔曼,岳礼玲.一个案例两种制度--美德刑事司法比较[M].郭志媛译.北京:中国法制出版社,2006.
  • 4勒内·达维德.当代主要法律体系[M].漆竹生译.上海:译文出版社,1984.
  • 5松尾浩也.日本刑事诉讼法(下卷)[M].张凌译.北京:法律出版社,2005.
  • 6陈健民.刑事诉讼法要论[M].台北:政策研究基金会,2004.
  • 7Joachim Herrmann, Bargaining Justice A Bargain for German Criminal Justice .9 U.PITT.L.REV.755 ( 1992 ).
  • 8中国法律年鉴编辑部.中国法律年鉴[M].北京:中国法律年鉴出版社,2008.
  • 9陈菲.我国律师队伍发展到14.3万多人[EB/OL].中国法院网http://www.chinacourt.org/html/article/200804/15/296725shtml.
  • 10克劳思·罗科信.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003..

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部