期刊文献+

网络效应下优势厂商的兼并行为选择

The Dominant Enterprise How to Merge with Network Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于Salop模型,分析了存在网络效应的市场中具有成本优势的厂商如何进行兼并,兼并后是否保留被兼并品牌,以及兼并行为对社会福利的影响。结果表明,在网络效应较弱并且优势厂商的成本优势也不明显时,厂商倾向于放弃被兼并品牌的兼并,优势很大时则会选择不兼并。网络效应的增强会使得优势厂商更倾向于兼并且保留被兼并品牌,并且不论网络效应的大小,保留被兼并品牌的兼并会增加社会福利,放弃被兼并品牌的兼并会减少社会福利。 Based on the Salop model, the paper analyzes the dominant enterprise that has the cost advantage how to choose merger, whether to keep the merged brand and the behavior how to affect social welfare in the market with network effects. The results show that if the network effects and cost advantage both are weak, the dominant enterprise tends to merge but abandon the merged brand. If the network effects become stronger the dominant enterprise inclines to merge and reserves the merged brand. No matter how strong or how weak are the network effects, to retain merged brand will increase social welfare, and to abandon the merged brands will reduce social welfare.
作者 李林杰
出处 《科技和产业》 2012年第11期133-137,共5页 Science Technology and Industry
关键词 网络效应 兼并 Salop模型 成本优势 network effects merger Salop model cost advantage
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1OZ SHY. Industrial Organization Theory and Applications [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995:253-254.
  • 2MICHAEL L KATZ, CARL SHAPIRO. Technology adop-tion in the presence of network externalities[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1986,94(4):822 841.
  • 3MICHAEL L KATZ, CARL SHAPIRO. Network Externali- ties, competition, and Compatibility[J]. The American Eco- nomic Review,1985,75(3) :424-440.
  • 4贺骏.F团高朋网完成二合一团购业并购潮起[N].证券日报,2012-08-08.
  • 5张黎明.卓越亚马逊更名“亚马逊中国”一卓越品牌消失[N].北京晨报,2011-10-27.
  • 6STEPHEN W SALANT, SHELDON SWITZER, ROBERT J REYNOLDS. Losses From Horizontal Merger: The Effects of an Exogenous Change in Industry Structure on Cournot - Nash Equilibrium[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983 (98):185-199.
  • 7RAYMOND DENECKERE, CARL DAVIDSON. Incentives to form coalitions with Bertrand competition[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics. 1985,16(4):473-486.
  • 8STEFFEN HUCK, KAI A KONRAD, WIDLAND MULL- ER. Big fish eat small fish: on merger in stankelberg markets [J].Economics Letters, 2001,73(2) :213-217.
  • 9翁轶丛,陈宏民,倪苏云.网络效应下的企业横向兼并与价格竞争[J].上海交通大学学报,2002,36(4):574-577. 被引量:16
  • 10翁轶丛,陈宏民,倪苏云.基于网络外部性的企业横向兼并研究[J].系统工程学报,2003,18(2):109-114. 被引量:14

二级参考文献55

  • 1干春晖,李雪.网络效应与自然垄断产业的分拆:以电信业为例[J].上海管理科学,2003,25(6):16-18. 被引量:10
  • 2周瑞凌,陈宏民.企业兼并实证研究综述:方法和成果[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(4):419-426. 被引量:4
  • 3王国才.网络外部性、差异化竞争与主流化策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(5):105-110. 被引量:6
  • 4泰勒尔 张维迎(译).产业组织理论[M].中国人民大学出版社,1997,8..
  • 5丹尼斯·卡尔顿 杰弗里·佩罗夫.现代产业组织[M].上海人民出版社,1998..
  • 6ShapiroC VarianH.信息规则[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.182-242.
  • 7Katz M L, Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities [ J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94(4) : 822-841.
  • 8Economides N. The economics of networks.[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1996, 1 (14) : 673-700.
  • 9王魏.世纪并购[M].上海:上海三联出版社,2000.
  • 10Mason R. Network externalities and the coase conjecture [ J ]. European Economic Review, 2000, 44 (2) : 1981-1992.

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部