期刊文献+

我国的财政赤字与李嘉图等价:1981-2010

China's Financial Deficits and Ricardo Equivalence: 1981-2010
下载PDF
导出
摘要 李嘉图等价定理认为,在一定的条件下政府财政赤字通过债务发行还是增加税收来融资是无关紧要的,政府支出与总需求无关。这是因为理性的经济主体会意识到当前的赤字就是将来的税收负担。文章根据我国1981-2010年的时间序列数据,利用协整分析方法和向量误差修正模型,对李嘉图等价的有效性进行了检验。实证结果表明:无论长期还是短期李嘉图等价定理在我国并不成立,财政支出对居民消费具有促进作用,逆周期的积极的财政政策是有效的。这很可能是由于李嘉图等价定理的前提条件在我国尚不存在。但实证结果也显示,居民可支配收入对居民消费的影响远远大于财政赤字和国债发行。因此通过减税等政策措施增加居民可支配收入应当成为财政政策的重点。 The Ricardo equivalence theorem states that it is inconsequential whether a government deficit is financed by debt issue or by tax increases under certain conditions. The effect of government expenditure on total demand is orthogonal because rational economic agents consider today' s deficit financing as tomorrow' s tax liabilities. This article tests the validity of Ricardo equivalence in China during the period from 1981 to 2010 through co-integration analysis and vector error correction model. The empirical results show that, whether in the long-term or shortterm Ricardo equivalence theorem is not practical in China. Fiscal expenditure can increase household consumption, and positive fiscal policy for inverse cycle is effective. It is most likely that the premise condition of Ricardo equivalence theorem does not exist in China. But the empirical results also show that the impact of disposable income on household consumption is far greater than that of fiscal deficits and public debt. Therefore, the policies to increase the disposable income of residents by tax cuts and other measures should be the focus of fiscal policy.
作者 刘艳梅
出处 《山东财政学院学报》 2012年第6期59-63,共5页 Journal of Shandong Finance Institute
基金 山东省自然科学基金重点项目"国际金融危机对山东省经济增长和劳动就业影响的实证分析与对策研究"(ZR2010GZ002)
关键词 财政赤字 国债发行 李嘉图等价 fiscal deficit national debt issue Ricardo equivalence
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1BARRO, ROBERT J. Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1974,68 (6) : 187 - 209.
  • 2BARRO, ROBERT J. The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits [ J ]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989, 67 ( 3 ) : 153 - 176.
  • 3KORMENDI. Government Debt, Government Spending and Private Sector Behavior[ J]. American Economic Review, 1953, 73 (4) : 9942 - 1010.
  • 4ASCHAUER. Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Demand[ J]. American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (1) :117 -127.
  • 5AHMED. Temporary and Permanent Government Spending in An Open Economy:Some Evidence for the United Kingdom[ J ]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1986, 17 (2) : 197 - 224.
  • 6RAMEY, SHAIRO. Costly Capital Reallocation and the Effect of Government Spending[ J ]. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1998, 48(1): 145- 194.
  • 7MOUNTFORD, UHLIG. What Are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks [ R ]. Discussion Paper, Tilburg University, Center for Econom- ic Research, 2000, 31:12-31.
  • 8BUMSIDE. Fiscal Shocks and Their Consequences[ R]. NBER Working Paper, 2003,6 : 12 - 21.
  • 9TSUNG WUHO. The Government Spending and Private Consumption: A Panel Integration Analysis [ J ]. International Review of Eco- nomics and Finance, 2001, 76(10) : 95 -108.
  • 10KARRAS. Government Spending and Private Consumption : Some International Evidence [ J ]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1994, 26(1) : 9 -22.

二级参考文献70

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部