法律移植问题的再思考——质疑方孔先生移植论

Rethinking of Legal Transplantation

方孔先生从实在法由自然法物化出的角度出发,对法律移植的可行性进行了论证,指出法律移植需要具备共同的自然法基础并且只能在实在法层面发生。但是其理论观点并没有对人性关系和自然法的固定性进行清晰的阐释,法律内核和债的概念的例证也缺乏说服力,其文中还存在三组矛盾之处,对沃-勒之争的解读有误,同时还缺乏移植必要性的论证。法律移植可以被理解为是一种先进法文化种子漂移的过程,必要性与可行性两方面的论证应当兼具。

In perspective of the positive law origins of the natural law, Mr. Fang Kong demonstrated the feasibility of legal transplantation, pointing out that legal transplantation must base on the common natural law basis and only the positive law can be transplanted. However, Mr. Fang＇s theory doesn＇t explain the human natural and the natural law＇s fixity clearly, and his illustration of the law＇s kernel and the debt＇s conception is also lack of persuasiveness. In his article, there are three contradictions and a shortage of legal transplantation necessity＇s reasoning process. In my opinion, legal transplantation can be understood as a process of an advanced law seeds, both the demonstration of necessity and feasibility should be included.