摘要
对我国《物权法》第181、189及196条所规范的制度的性质存在两种观点:动产浮动抵押及特别动产集合抵押。产生这两种观点的原因在于对浮动抵押制度界定的差异。浮动抵押制度的特征在于标的物的浮动性、抵押人处分抵押物的自由及可转化为固定抵押,依据这三个特征可以确定,我国《物权法》的181、189及196条所规范的制度为动产浮动抵押。创设特别动产集合抵押制度并不利于我国对这三个条款所规范内容的理解及适用。
There are two viewpoints of the articles of 181, 189 and 196 of Real Property Law, one is the chattel floating charge, the other are the special collective chattel charge. The reason is how to define the floating charge. The features of floating charge are the floating of collateral, the mortgagors' rights of disposing of collateral and transformablity to chattel charge. From the characteristic we can conclude that it is the chattel floating charge regulated in Real Property Law. The construction of new specific collective chattel charge does not help us understand and apply what these three articles.regulate.
出处
《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》
2012年第6期92-96,共5页
Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
基金
教育部规划基金项目"公司归入权之理论基础与立法规制"
项目编号:12YJA820073
国家社会科学基金规划一般项目"权利冲突研究:基于法经济学视角"
项目编号:12BFX010
关键词
动产浮动抵押
特别动产集合抵押
浮动性
结晶
the chattel floating charge
specific collective chattel charge
floating
crystal