期刊文献+

固定式吉妮宫内节育器与Tcu200节育器的临床应用观察 被引量:3

Clinical observation on 126 patients used Gynefix intrauterine uterine device.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨固定式吉妮宫内节育器的临床疗效。方法选取本院2008年12月至2010年11月固定式吉妮宫内节育器使用者126例作为观察组,随机选取在我院使用Tcu200节育器避孕者125例作为对照组,并对所有节育器使用者进行1年随访,比较两组人员的避孕效果和不良反应情况。结果观察组有效避孕率(95.2%)明显高于对照组(72.8%),观察组避孕失败率(1.6%)和因故取出率(3.2%)明显低于对照组(8.8%、18.4%),观察组不良反应率(10.3%)明显低于对照组(22.4%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用固定式吉妮宫内节育器的临床效果显著,有效避孕率高且不良反应低,是一种安全可行的避孕方法,值得临床推广使用。 Objective To investigate clinical efficiency of Gynefix intrauterine uterine device. Methods 126 peoples used Gynefix intrauterine uterine device were selected in the hospital from December 2008 to November 2011 as the observation group. 125 peoples used TCu200 intrauterine uterine device were randomly selected in the hospital as the control group. All of IUD users were followed up for 1 years. The contraceptive efficacy and adverse reaction were compared between two groups. Results The effective contraception rate (95.2%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (72.8%). The contraceptive failure rate (1.6%) and for some reason extraction rate (3.2% ) in the observation group was significantly lower than contraceptive failure rate(8.8% ) and for some reason extraction rate (18.4%) in the control group. The rate of adverse reactions (10.3%) in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (22.4%). The differences were statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion The use of Gynefix intrauterine uterine device has good clinical effect. The effective contraception rate is high while adverse reactions are low. That is a safe and effective method of contraception. That is worthy of clinical use.
作者 陈京川
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2012年第21期120-121,共2页 Hainan Medical Journal
关键词 固定式吉妮宫内节育器 TCu200节育器 避孕 不良反应 Gynefix intrauterine uterine device TCu200 intrauterine uterine device Contraception Adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Zapata LB, Whiteman MK, Tepper NK, et al. Intrauterine device use among women with uterine fibroids: a systematic review [J]. Contraception, 2010, 82(1): 41-55.
  • 2Glass T, Baker T, Kauffman RP. Migration of an intrauterine contra- ceptive device during the course of pregnancy: A case report [J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2009,81-83.
  • 3Naomi K, Lauren B, Jamieson D J, et al. Use of intrauterine devices in women with uterine anatomic abnormalities [J]. International Joumal of Gynecology, 2010, 109(1): 52-54.
  • 4张伟锐,焦慧.放置吉妮IUD120例临床效果观察[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(05Z):120-120. 被引量:3
  • 5Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RI, Boekkooi PF, et al. Is an Inla-auterine De- vice a Contraindication for Uterine Artery Embolization? A Study of 20 Patients [J]. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2010, 21 (2): 272-274.
  • 6Mansour D. The benefits and risks of using a lcvonorgestrel-relcas- ing intrauterine system for contraception [J]. Contraception,2012, 85 (3): 224-234.
  • 7Usama M, Dalia Y, Hassan M. Uterine artery blood flow in patients with copper intrauterine device-induced abnormal uterine bleeding [.l]. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 2010, 15(3):168-173.
  • 8Lete I, del Carme Cuesta M, Juan M, et al. Acceptability of the levo- norgestrel intrauterine system in the long-term treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: how many women choose to use a second de- vice? [J]. European Journal of Obstetrics, 2011, 154(I): 67-70.
  • 9Mona M, Hegazy M, Saber W, et al. Three dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device [J]. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 2011, 16(2): 121-124.
  • 10段永惠.两种宫内节育器的临床效果观察[J].四川医学,2010,31(5):631-632. 被引量:7

二级参考文献4

共引文献8

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部