期刊文献+

先验评价刍议

Preliminary Discussion of Transcendental Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 评价是教育学中的重要环节,而最广泛意义上的评价也是一种社会治理与控制。一般意义上,通常所指的评价与教育评价都是指基于过往经验的。本文试图从康德的先验判断力给予的洞见着手,结合精神现象学的理论,阐释相对于经验的先验评价以及体验性评价原则。希望可以给经验性评价某种启示与反思。 Evaluation or assessment is key to Education, and in the widest sense it is also a kind of social administration and domination. The usual-sense evaluation and educational assessment are all based on the past experience. This paper, from the perspective of the transcendental judgment which is a terminology invented by Kant, illuminates the principles of transcendental evaluation in contrast with experience and experiencing assessment in connection with phenomenologieal theory, in hopes of providing some revelations and reflections for the empirical evaluation.
作者 杨澄宇
出处 《江苏教育研究》 2012年第11期7-11,共5页 Jiangsu Education Research
关键词 经验评价 先验判断力 先验评价 体验评价 empirical evaluation transcendental judgment transcendental evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[美]沃尔特·本·迈克尔斯.黄金标准与自然主义逻辑[M].Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press,1987.
  • 2格特.比斯塔,赵康.教育研究和教育实践中的证据和价值[J].北京大学教育评论,2011,9(1):123-135. 被引量:24
  • 3[德]朔伊尔&施密特教育学[M].胡劲松译.转引自瞿葆奎主编.教育与教育学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1993.
  • 4[德]卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯.时代的精神状况[M].王德峰译.上海:上海译文出版社,1997.35~38.
  • 5杨向东.促进学习的课堂评价设计与使用[J].基础教育课程,2010(6):62-64. 被引量:17
  • 6杨向东.谈课堂评价的地位与重建[J].全球教育展望,2009,38(9):42-46. 被引量:23
  • 7[美]W.V.蒯因.经验主义的两个教条.[美]A.P.马蒂尼奇编.语言哲学[M].牟博等译.北京:商务印书馆,2006.
  • 8[德]伊曼努尔·康德.判断力批判[M].邓晓芒,译.北京:人民出版社,2002:5.
  • 9[德]伊曼努尔·康德.纯粹理性批判[M].邓晓芒译.北京:人民出版社.2002.
  • 10[德]伊曼努尔·康德.实践理性批判[M].邓晓芒译.北京:人民出版社.2002.

二级参考文献49

  • 1Redfidd, D., Roeber, E, & Stiggins, R. J. (2008). Building balanced assessment systems to guide educational improvement. Paper presented at the National Conference on Student Assessment, June 15, Orlando, FL.
  • 2Baxter, G. P. & Glaser, R. (1998). Investigating the cognitive complexity of science assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 17 (3) : 37 - 45.
  • 3Popham, W. J. ( 2000 ). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for educational leaders. Needham, M.A:Allyn and Bacon.
  • 4Mislevy, R. J. (1996). Test theory reconceived. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(4) :382.
  • 5National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment. Pelligrino, J., Chudowsky, N., and Glaser, R., editors. Board on testing and assessment, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • 6Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessment improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5) : 1 - 6.
  • 7Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 ( 1 ) : 7 - 74.
  • 8Stiggins, R.J., Arter, J.A., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2006). Classroom assessment for student learning. ETS, Portland, OR.
  • 9Ax, J. & Ponte, P. (2010). Moral issues in educational praxis: A perspective from pedagogiek and didactiek as human sciences in continental Europe. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 29-42.
  • 10Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

共引文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部