小珠山三期文化与双砣子一期文化再认识

Remarks on the Xiaozhushan Ⅲ Culture and the Shuangtuozi Ⅰ Culture——View on the Pottery

长期以来,小珠山三期和双砣子一期文化究竟是同一文化还是不同文化,双砣子一期是否进入青铜时代,一直存在争议。通过对以往的发掘资料进行重新认识和新的考古发现的不断丰富,笔者认为,小珠山三期和双砣子一期应属于同一文化的不同阶段,应为铜石并用时期,双砣子一期进入青铜时代的证据不足。小珠山三期和双砣子一期应为受山东龙山文化强烈影响的辽南土著文化,不应划入山东龙山文化势力范围。

Different views had been existed about the problems that if the Xiaozhushan Ⅲ Culture and the Shuang- tuoziⅠ Culture are the same culture, and if the Shuangtuozi Ⅰ Culture had entered the Bronze Age. Based on the new archaeological materials, we think that the two cultures should be of the same culture in different stages, and enter the Chalcolithic Age. There is no evidence to prove that the shuangtuozi Ⅰ Culture had entered the Bronze Age. The two cultures mentioned above should be of the southern Liaoning local culture influenced by the Shandong Longshan Culture, and they should not be of the Shandong Longshan culture.