期刊文献+

中文版模棱两可、目的和敌意问卷的信效度 被引量:8

Reliability and validity of the Chinese-version of the ambiguous intentions hostility questionnaire
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析中文版模棱两可、目的和敌意问卷(AIHQ—C)的信度和效度。方法采用中文版模棱两可、目的和敌意问卷(AIHQ-C)对303名正常健康者和202名精神分裂症患者进行评估,间隔两周后,随机抽取110名正常健康者和70名患者进行重测,并以偏执量表(Pa)为效标,计算校标关联效度。结果信度检验:AIHQ—C的敌意偏向总分(THB)、责备偏向总分(TBB)和攻击偏向总分(TAB)的Cronbachα系数分别为0.78,0.94,0.84(P〈0.01),每个场景下敌意偏向分(HB)、责备偏向分(BB)和攻击偏向分(AB)的Cronbachα系数在0.51—0.90之间。AIHQ-C的THB、TBB和TAB的重测信度分别为0.71,0.73,0.68(P〈0.01),每个场景下HB、BB和AB的重测信度在0.48~0.73之间。效度检验:AIHQ.C的THB、TBB和TAB与Pa的相关系数分别为0.51,0.37,0.41(P〈0.01),每个场景下HB、BB和AB与Pa的相关系数在0.23—0.52之间,表明AIHQ—C具有较好的校标关联效度。精神分裂症患者AIHQ—C的THB、TBB和TAB及其每个场景下HB、BB和AB的得分显著高于正常者,表明AIHQ—C具有较好的实证效度。结论AIHQ-C具有较好的信度和效度,适合评估精神分裂症患者和正常人群的敌意归因偏向。 Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese-version of the Ambiguous In- tentions Hostility Questionnaire(AIHQ-C). Methods 303 healthy subjects and 202 schizophrenic patients were asked to completed the AIHQ-C along with measures of" Paranoia Scale (Pa). Two weeks later, 110 healthy sub- jects and 70 schizophrenic patients who were randomly selected from the total sample completed the AIHQ-C again to compute the test-retest reliability. The criterion-related validity was evaluated by correlating the AIHQ-C with Pa. Results ( 1 ) The Cronbach α coefficient of total Hostility Bias ( THB ), total Blame Bias ( TBB ) and total Ag- gression Bias (TAB) for the AIHQ-C was 0. 78 ,0. 94,0. 84 (P 〈 0.01 ) respectively, and the Cronbach α coefficient of Hostility Bias(HB), Blame Bias(BB) and Aggression Bias (AB)for each situation of the AIHQ-C was between 0.51 and 0.90. The test-retest reliability of THB ,TBB and TAB for the AIHQ-C was 0.71,0.73,0.68(P〈0.01 ) respectively, and the test-retest reliability of HB, BB and AB for each situation of the AIHQ-C was between 0.48 and 0.73. (2) Pa was positively correlated with THB,TBB and TAB ( r=0.51,0.37,0.41, P〈0.01 ,respective- ly) and the correlation coefficients of HB ,BB and AB for each situation of the AIHQ-C with Pa was between 0.23 and 0.52. The results indicated that the AIHQ-C had good criterion-related validity. (3)Schizophrenic patients had higher scores of the AIHQ-C than the healthy subjects ,it suggested that the AIHQ-C had good discriminant va- lidity. Conclusion The AIHQ-C has good reliability and validity in application to Chinese people.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期1038-1041,共4页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81171273) 安徽省高校省级自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2010A165)
关键词 敌意 归因 问卷 信度 效度 精神分裂症 Hostility Attribution Scale Reliability Validity Schizophrenia
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Green MF, Penn DL, Bentall R, et al. Social Cognition in Schizophre- nia: An NIMH workshop on definitions, assessment and research op- portunities. Schizotphr Bull ,2008,34 1211-31220.
  • 2Abramson LV, Seligman MEP, Teasdale JD. Learned helplessness in humans : Critique and reformulation. J Abnorm Psychol, 1978,87:49- 74.
  • 3Mizrahi R, Addington J, Remington G, et al. Attribution style as a fac- tor in psychosis and symptom resolution. Scbizophr Res, 2008,104: 220 -227.
  • 4Combs DR, Penn DL, Wicher M, et al. The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ) : a new measure for evaluating hostile social-cognitive biases in paranoia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry, 2007,12 : 128-143.
  • 5Combs DR, Penn DL, Michael CO, eI al. Perceptions of hostility by persons with and without persecutory delusions. Cogn Neuropsychia- try,2009,14:30-52.
  • 6An SK, Kang JI, Park JY, et al. Attribution bias in ultra-high risk for psychosis and first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res,2010,118 : 54-61.
  • 7Elnakeeb M, Abdel-Dayem S, Gaafar M, et al. Attributional style of Egyptians with schizophrenia. Int J Ment Health Nurs ,2010 ,19 :445- 56.
  • 8Combs DR, Adams SD, Penn DLiet. al. Social cognition and interac- tion training (SCIT) for inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disor- ders : Preliminary findings. Schizophr Res ,2007,91 : 112-116.
  • 9Roberts DL, Penn DL Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT) for outpatients with schizophrenia: A preliminary study. Psy- chiatry Res ,2009,166 : 141-147.
  • 10甄文凤,王红星,马辛.精神分裂症患者攻击行为的神经生物学研究进展[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2011,20(1):91-92. 被引量:12

二级参考文献30

  • 1陈启豹,曹栋,谢世平,袁勇贵.男性精神分裂症患者攻击行为与血浆5-羟色胺、血清睾酮水平的相关性[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(24):5040-5041. 被引量:6
  • 2姜红燕,许秀峰,赵旭东,程宇琪,刘华,杨建中.精神分裂症攻击行为与儿茶酚氧位甲基转移酶基因多态性[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2005,31(3):202-205. 被引量:10
  • 3周朝昀,沙维伟,丁兆生,张晓斌,刘进文,王万章,从小兵,袁佩云.伴攻击行为精神精神分裂症患者血浆5-羟色胺水平的研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(8):685-686. 被引量:5
  • 4Fazel S,Grann M.The population impact of severe mental illness on violent crime.Am J Psychiatry,2006,163:1397-1403.
  • 5Giammanco M,Tabacchi G,Giammanco S,et al.Testosterone and aggressiveness.Med Sci Monit,2005,11:136-145.
  • 6Moore TM,Scarpa A,Raine A.A meta-analysis of serotonin metabolite 5-HIAA and antisocial behavior.Aggr Behav,2002,28:299-316.
  • 7Friedel RO.Dopamine dysfunction in borderline personality disorder:A hypothesis.Neuropsychopharmacology,2004,29:1029-1039.
  • 8Swann AC.Neuroreptor mechanisms of aggression and its treatment.J Clin Psychiatry,2003,64:26-35.
  • 9Sigmundsson T,Meier M,Toone BK,et al.Frontal lobe N-acetylaspartate correlates with psychopathology in schizophrenia:a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.Schizophr Res,2003,64:63-71.
  • 10Phan KL,Fitzgerald DA,Nathan PJ,et al.Neural substrates for voluntsry suppression of negative affect:A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Biol Psychiatry,2005,57:210-219.

共引文献11

同被引文献50

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部