期刊文献+

护理本科生临床专业实践行为评价问卷的编制 被引量:7

Development of clinical professional performance questionnaire for undergraduate nursing students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制适合评价护理本科生临床专业实践行为的问卷。方法在文献复习的基础上设计问卷.经专家反复修订后,对345名护理本科生进行调查,采用鉴别度检验、同质性检验和探索性因子分析筛选问卷条目.确定正式问卷。然后对正式问卷的各项指标进行评价。结果正式问卷包括5个维度28个条目,分别为应用护理程序(5个务目)、护理操作及在操作中遵循伦理原则(6个条目)、健康教育(4个条目)、沟通交流(5个条目)、评判性思维(8个条目)。该问卷信度Cronbach’s α为0.937,各维度Cronbach’S α在0.822-0.881;初始问卷的内容效度均值0.94;正式问卷的因子结构理想,以特征值>1为标准,用主成分分析法共提取5个公因子,累计贡献率为61.976%。结论正式问卷具有良好的信效度.可以用来评价护理本科生的临床专业实践行为。 Objective To develop an instrument to measure the clinical professional performance of undergraduate nursing students. Methods The initial questionnaire was formed on the basis of literature review. Then it was revised by expert counseling and was used to evaluate 345 undergraduate nursing students. Discrimination test,homogeneity test,and exploratory factor analysis were conducted to select items. The reliability and validity of the final questionnaire was tested. Results The final questionnaire consisted of 28 items in 5 dimensions,including application of nursing process(5 items),clinical practice and adherence to ethical principles(6 iteins),heahh education(4 items),communication(5 items)and critical thinking(8 items). Cronbaeh's α of the questionnaire was 0.937,and Cronbach's α of each subscale ranged from 0.822 to 0.881. The content validity index of the initial questionnaire was 0.94. The factor structure of the final questionnaire was ideal and five factors were ex- tracted by principal component analysis,which could explain 61.976% of the total variance. Conclusion The final question- naire has good reliability and validity. It can be used as an instrument to evaluate clinical professional performance of under- graduate nursing students.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期1110-1112,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 教育 护理 学士 临床实习 问卷调查 信度 效度 Education, Nursing,Baccalaureate Clinical Clerkship Questionnaires Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Schwirian PM. Evaluating the performance of nurses:a multidimensional approach[J].Nursing Research,1986,(06):382-385.
  • 2Meretoja R,Leino-Kilpi H. Instruments for evaluating nurse competence[J].Journal of Nursing Administration,2001,(7/8):346-352.
  • 3王艳梅,孙田杰.护理本科生临床实践行为的评价分析[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2001,16(2):106-107. 被引量:41
  • 4Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nuts Res,1986,(06):382-385.
  • 5刘可.如何进行内容效度的检验[J].护士进修杂志,2010,25(1):37-39. 被引量:146
  • 6吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用[M]重庆:重庆大学出版社,2011157-193200204208483-490.
  • 7肖顺贞.护理研究[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,200787-90.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Polit, DF, Beck, CT. the content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations[J]. Research in Nursing& Health, 2006,29,489-497.
  • 2Lynn . MR Determination and quantification of content validify [J]. Nursing Research, 1986,35(6) :382-385.
  • 3Davis, LL. 1992. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts[J]. Applied Nursing Research, 1992, 5(4): 194-197.
  • 4Polit, DF, Beck, CT, Owen, SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations [J]. Research in Nursing &Health, 2007,30,459-467.
  • 5Grant, JS, Davis, LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development[J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20, 269-274.
  • 6Waltz, CF. Strickland, O. , & Lenz, E. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. 3rd ed. 2005. New York: Springer Publishing Co. 20-69.
  • 7梁涛,李峥.论护理临床教学的几个重要环节[J].中华护理杂志,1999,34(3):167-169. 被引量:155
  • 8王玉琼,邓云清,吴育萍.对三个层次护生临床带教质量的评价分析[J].护士进修杂志,2000,15(1):16-18. 被引量:16
  • 9绳宇.护理教育中影响整体护理实施的2个突出问题[J].实用护理杂志,2000,16(6):2-3. 被引量:16

共引文献185

同被引文献83

引证文献7

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部