期刊文献+

军事仿真分析评估系统互操作性标准化 被引量:2

Standardized Interoperability for Military Analysis and Evaluation Simulation System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 下一代的军事仿真分析评估系统将仿真系统与实际指挥控制系统有机结合,为军事复杂系统提供更准确的分析、预测与控制方法,从而有效提高决策的灵活性和前瞻性,降低决策风险。如何在军事仿真分析评估系统顶层分析与设计阶段关注和体现系统的互操作性,这是决策者、系统设计和开发人员,以及最终使用人员必须高度重视的问题。采用主流的国际标准和通用标准,将极大提高系统应用的开发能力和开发质量。研究了当前作战模拟领域主流的几种互操作性国际标准和通用标准的体系结构的发展进程,并对其互操作性和标准之间的相互关系进行了具体的分析与阐述。 Next-generation military simulation analysis and evaluation system may integrate simulation into real Command & Control system. It will provide more accurate analysis, forecast and control methods to improve the flexibility and sureness of the decide-making and reduce the risk. It is critical for decide-maker, system designer and end user that importance of interoperability should be highlighted in the upper analysis and design phases. The fact was stressed that mainstream international and universal standards could be used for improving system development capability and quality. The approach for the development of international and universal standards in the operational simulation domain were described, and the ongoing research was proposed in these aspects with examples from several important application areola.
出处 《系统仿真学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期2455-2462,共8页 Journal of System Simulation
基金 国家自然科学基金(61074108)
关键词 分析评估系统 互操作性 标准化 C2IEDM JC3IEDM 战场管理语言 军事想定定义语言 analysis and evaluation system interoperability standardize command and control information exchange data model (C2IEDM) joint consultation, command, and control information exchange data model (JC3IEDM) battle management language (BML) military scenario description language (MSDL)
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1胡晓峰作战模拟术语导读[M].北京:国防大学出版社,2004.
  • 2CAISR Architecture Working Group. Levels of Information Systems Interoperability (LISI). [EB/OL] (1997) [2012-7-22]. www.defenselink.mil/nii/org/cio/i3/lisirpt.pdf>(1998).
  • 3Clark T, Jones R. Organisational Interoperability Maturity Model for C2 [C]// Proceedings of the 4th Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Rhode Island, USA: US Naval War College 1999.
  • 4C41SR Architecture Working Group. Levels of Information Systems Interoperability, C4ISR Architectures Working Group, 30 March 1998, available at: US DoD, OSD (C3I), CIO, Director for Architecture and Interoperability Website [EB/OL]. (1998) [2012-7-22]. http ://www.c3 i.osd.mil/org/cio/i3/.
  • 5Turnitsa C D. Extending the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model [C]// Proceedings IEEE Summer Computer Simulation Conference. USA: IEEE CS Press, 2005.
  • 6L S Winters, M M Gorman, A Tolk. Next generation data interoperability: It's all about the metadata [C]// Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop. Orlando, FL, USA: IEEE, September 2006:268-276.
  • 7Hamilton John A. Joint interoperability from the service C4I systems command [C]// Proceedings of the Software Technology Conference 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, April 20-May 5, 2000. Hill Air Force Base, UT, USA: SoRware Technology Support Center, 2000.
  • 8李云刚.从伊拉克战争看美军C4ISR系统的标准化[J].军用标准化,2004,16(3):58-60.
  • 9A Tolk, S Y Diallo. Model-based data engineering for Web services [J]. Internet Computing IEEE: (ISSN, 1089-7801), 2005, 9(4): 65-70.
  • 10MIP. The Multilateral lnteroperability Program (MIP) [EB/OL]. (2003) [2012-7-22].http://www.mip-site.org.

二级参考文献3

共引文献4

同被引文献11

  • 1王振,缪旭东.基于XML的作战方案形式化描述[J].系统仿真学报,2006,18(z2):41-44. 被引量:20
  • 2Defense Information Infrastructure (DII) Common Operating Environment (COE) Integration and Runtime Specification (I&RTS) [EB/OL].Version [2000-10-03].http ://dodead. mont.disa.mil/cm/general.html.
  • 3Defense Information Infrastructure (DII) Common Operating Environment (COE) Kernel Platform Compliance (KPC) Program Document for DII COE Kernel [EB/OL]. [2001-05-31].http://diicoe.disa.mil/coe/kpc/kpc_program_ doc.doc.
  • 4DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD Architec- ture Framework Version 1.0 [R].Washington DC, Depart- ment of Defense, 2004.
  • 5DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD Architec- ture Framework Version 1.5 [R].Washington DC,Depart- ment of Defense, 2007.
  • 6DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. DoD Architec- ture Framework Version 2.0 [R].Washington DC,Depart- ment of Defense, 2009.
  • 7PULLEN J,HEFFNER K,KHIMECHE L,et al. An expanded C2-simulation experimental environment based on BML[C]// IEEE Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL,USA,2010.
  • 8左毅.美国国防部体系结构框架[R].北京:中国电子科学研究院,2008.
  • 9高阜乡,马超,欧有远.军事电子信息系统互操作性测评研究综述[J].中国电子科学研究院学报,2009,4(1):19-25. 被引量:20
  • 10李玮,仇建伟.信息系统互操作性评估技术研究[J].现代电子技术,2015,38(8):84-88. 被引量:10

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部