期刊文献+

“科学探究”缘何变身“科学实践”?——解读美国科学教育框架理念的首位关键词之变 被引量:124

From Scientific Inquiry to Scientific Practices?——Interpreting an Essential Change in American National Framework for Science Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 在美国科学教育新框架中,首位关键词由"科学探究"变为"科学实践",这一变更折射出近20年来美国科学教育研究者扭转课堂探究模式化倾向的努力。探究模式化的根源,可追溯到"科学(实验)方法"和"科学(思维)方法"在美国科学教育史上的主导地位。框架使用"科学实践"一词,凸显了融合社会、认知、行为三个维度的实践观。其实施要求理论性探究在课堂探究活动中占主导地位,并要求科学作为社会性活动的特质在课堂上得到充分施展。 Abstract: In A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices. Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (NRC, 2011) , an essential change is that scientific inquiry, a term pervading NSES (NRC, 1996) and science education literature over the past two decades, is replaced hy a new term, scienlifie practices. This change reflects Ihe efforts from American science education researchers in reconstructing the image of classroom inquiry, which has been misinterpreted by many as a synonym fur scientific method, a type of formalistic accounts dominating American seienee education history. Using the term scienlifie practiees, the framework put science-related pracliees in social, cognitive, and hehavioral dimensions on equal footing. Its implementation will then require in science classrooms a leading position for theoretical inquiries and processes that can represent the features of science as social activities.
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第11期141-145,共5页 Educational Research
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划国家一般课题"社会性课堂学习环境对科学探究有效性的影响"(课题批准号:BFA110052)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 科学探究 科学实践 科学方法 scientific inquiry, scientific practices, scientific method
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1National Research Council.A Framework for K-12 Seience Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2012.30,42-44 ,44,45.
  • 2黄芳.美国《科学教育框架》的特点及启示[J].教育研究,2012,33(8):143-148. 被引量:48
  • 3王威,刘恩山.美国科学教育框架设计理念的发展动态[J].外国教育研究,2012,39(8):70-75. 被引量:11
  • 4周玉芝.美国新版K-12科学教育框架对我国基础教育阶段科学教育的启示[J].课程.教材.教法,2012,32(6):120-124. 被引量:28
  • 5National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[S].Washington,D.C.:The National Academies Press,1996. 23,105.
  • 6C.R.Mann.The Interpretation of the College Entrance Examination Board's New Definition of the Requirement in Physies [J].Educational Review,1909(7).
  • 7John Dewey,Science as Subject-Matter and as Method[J].Science,1910, (1).
  • 8John Dewey.How We Think[M].Lexington,MA:Heath,1910.72.
  • 9Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society .General Education in a Free Society:Report of the Harvard Committee[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1945.158.
  • 10John Dewey. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process[M].Boston,MA:D.C.Heath and Company,1933.115-116.

二级参考文献20

  • 1李高峰,刘恩山.“前科学概念”的术语和定义的综述[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2006,28(6):43-45. 被引量:32
  • 2National Research Council. A Framework for K- 12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. [EB/ OL]. The National Academies Press: Washington, D.C. https:// download.nap.edu/catalog.php? record_id= 13165.
  • 3National Research Council. National Science Education Standards [ M ]. Washington : The National Academies Press. 1996.
  • 4Bottoms, G., and J.Uhn. Project Lead the Way Works: A New Type of Career and Technical Program. Southern Educational Review Board[Z]. 2007.
  • 5Satchwell, R.E., and F.L. Leopp. Designing and Implementing and Integrated Mathematics, Science, and Technology Curriculum for the Middle School [ J ] Journal of Industrial Education, 2002, (3).
  • 6National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [EB/OL]. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13165.
  • 7National Research Council. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade [M ]. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
  • 8National Research Council. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People,Places,and Pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments [M]. Washington,DC: The National Academies Press,2009.
  • 9American Association for the Advancement of Science. Designs for Science Literacy [EB/OL]. http://www.project2061 .org/publications/designs/default.htm.
  • 10National Research Council. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Com- mittee on Developments in the Science of Learning [ M ]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

共引文献80

同被引文献841

引证文献124

二级引证文献654

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部