期刊文献+

两种硅橡胶印模制取技术对种植模型精确性的影响比较

Comparison of two types of silicone impressions on accuracy of implant model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨2种硅橡胶印模制取技术对种植模型精确性的影响。方法分别采用机混式硅橡胶与手混式硅橡胶印模制取技术,制取标准口腔种植基桩模型的印模各15个,灌制成超硬石膏模型,比较所取印模对种植基桩精度上的差异。结果在颈缘精度上2种硅橡胶印模制取技术制取的模型比较有显著差异;在种植基桩高度、直径、肩台宽度上2种印模制取技术制取的模型比较无显著差异。结论这2种印模制取方法制取的模型均具有理想的精确性,但在固定烤瓷修复中对模型颈缘精确度要求颇高,不适宜使用机混式硅橡胶印模制取技术;手混式印模技术也可以应用于固定修复、活动义齿、种植转移模型获取等方面。 Objective To compare the different accuracy of implant model made by the two types of silicone impressions. Methods Fifteen impressions of standard abutment were made separately by machine-mixed and hand-mixed, then made into super-stone models and the accuracy of the different im- pressions was compared. Results The two types of silicone impressions showed significant difference of the margin precision, while differences on the height, diameter and the width of abutment shoulder were not found. Conclusions The two methods both have ideal accuracy, but porcelain- fused-to-metal restora- tions require high accuracy of the model shoulder, which is not suitable to use machine-mixed silicone im- pression technology, and hand-mixed method can be used in fixed restoration, removable denture and im- plant level impression.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2012年第34期76-78,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 硅橡胶 模型精确性 印模技术 Silicone Accuracy of impression Impression technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1施宏燕,张保卫.影响义齿印模精度的常见因素[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2007,16(3):150-153. 被引量:4
  • 2文理衡,刘清辉,周琳.固定修复三种印模法临床效果的对比[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(2):116-116. 被引量:11
  • 3杜方翀,陈吉华,甘云娜.戊二醛消毒液对4种高分子印模尺寸变化的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2007,23(2):268-271. 被引量:11
  • 4David Brown. Factors affecting the dimensional stability of elastic impression materials[ J]. J Dent, 1973,1 (6) : 265 - 274.
  • 5ISO 4823 for Elastomeric impression materials[S]. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Technical committee : TC 106 / SC 2; 2000.
  • 6ADA Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment: Revised American Dental Association Specification No. 19 for nonaqueous, elastomeric dental impression malerials [ J ]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1977, 94(4) : 733 -741.
  • 7Robert J. Luebke, Forrest R. Scandrett, Paul E. kerber. The effect of delayed and second pours on elastomeric impression material accuracy [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 1979,41 ( 5 ) :517 - 521.
  • 8A. M. Lacy, T. Bellman, H. Fukui,et al. Time-dependent accuracy of etastomer impression materials. Part I : Condensation silicones [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 1981,45 ( 2 ) :209 - 235.
  • 9A. M. Lacy, H. Fukui, T. Bellman, et al. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part lI : polyether, polysulfides, and polyvinylsiloxane [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 1981,45 (3) :329 -333.
  • 10Glen H. Johnson, Robert G. Craig. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and repeat pour of models [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 1985,53 (4) : 484 - 490.

共引文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部