期刊文献+

Stimulation Study of Gene Pyramiding inAnimals by Marker-Assisted Selection 被引量:2

Stimulation Study of Gene Pyramiding inAnimals by Marker-Assisted Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This gene pyramiding strategy is based on the idea of efficiently pyramiding genes of interest by crosses and selection to obtain a population with favorable alleles from different breeds or lines, which is called an ideal population. We investigate impacts of some factors on the pyramiding efficiencies by simulation. These factors include selection strategies (the breeding value selection, the molecular scores selection and the index selection), proportion selected (2, 10 and 20%), recombination rates between adjacent target genes (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5) and different mating types (the random mating and the positive assortative mating avoiding sib mating). The results show that: (1) The more recombination rate and the lower proportion male selected, the better pyramiding efficiency; (2) the ideal population is obtained via various selection strategies, while different selection strategies are suitable for different breeding objectives. From the perspective of pyramiding target genes merely, the molecular scores selection is the best one, for the purpose of pyramiding target genes and recovering genetic background of the target trait, the index selection is the best one, while from the saving cost point of view, the breeding value selection is the best one; (3) the positive assortative mating is more efficient for gene pyramiding compared with the random mating in the terms of the number of generations of intercross for getting the ideal population. This gene pyramiding strategy is based on the idea of efficiently pyramiding genes of interest by crosses and selection to obtain a population with favorable alleles from different breeds or lines, which is called an ideal population. We investigate impacts of some factors on the pyramiding efficiencies by simulation. These factors include selection strategies (the breeding value selection, the molecular scores selection and the index selection), proportion selected (2, 10 and 20%), recombination rates between adjacent target genes (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5) and different mating types (the random mating and the positive assortative mating avoiding sib mating). The results show that: (1) The more recombination rate and the lower proportion male selected, the better pyramiding efficiency; (2) the ideal population is obtained via various selection strategies, while different selection strategies are suitable for different breeding objectives. From the perspective of pyramiding target genes merely, the molecular scores selection is the best one, for the purpose of pyramiding target genes and recovering genetic background of the target trait, the index selection is the best one, while from the saving cost point of view, the breeding value selection is the best one; (3) the positive assortative mating is more efficient for gene pyramiding compared with the random mating in the terms of the number of generations of intercross for getting the ideal population.
出处 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第11期1871-1876,共6页 农业科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Major Special Project of China on New Varieties Cultivation for Transgenic Organisms (2009ZX08009-146B) by the National Non-profit Institute Research Grant,China (2012cj-2)
关键词 gene pyramiding pyramiding efficiency selection strategies mating types gene pyramiding, pyramiding efficiency, selection strategies, mating types
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Dekkers J C, Hospital F. 2002. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 22-32.
  • 2Falconer D S, Mackay T F C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th ed. Longman, Harlow, Essex.
  • 3Jiang L, Zhao F P, Zhang Q. 2009. Simulation of gene pyramiding in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 35, 737-742.
  • 4Jorjani H G, Engstrom, Strandberg E, Liljedahl L E. 1997. Genetic studies of assortative mating - a simulation study. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica (Section A, Animal Science), 47, 129-137.
  • 5MeuwissenTHE, Hayes B J, GoddardME. 2001. Prediction of total genomic value using genome-wide dense marker map. Genetics, 157, 1819-1829.
  • 6Piyasatian N, Fernando R L, Dekkers J C M. 2008. Introgressing multiple QTL in breeding programmes of limited size. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 50-56.
  • 7Servin B, Martin O C, Mezard M, Hospital F. 2004. Toward a theory of marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Genetics, 168, 513-523.
  • 8Takeda S, Matsuoka M. 2008. Genetic approaches to crop improvement: responding to environmental and population changes. Nature Review Genetics, 9, 444-457.
  • 9Zhao F P, Jiang L, Gao H J, Ding X D, Zhang Q. 2009. Design and comparison of gene-pyramiding schemes in animals. Animal, 3, 1075-1084.

同被引文献3

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部