1C. Mitchell , D. Bauknecht , P.M. Connor.Effectiveness through risk reduction : a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany[J].Energy Policy 34 (2006) 297-305.
2Corinna Klessmann ,Christian Nabe, Karsten Burges. Pros and cons of exposing renewables to electricity market risks—A comparison of the market integration approaches in Germany, Spain ,and the UK[J]. Energy Policy 36 (2008) 3646-3661.
3Judith Lipp .Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark,Germany and the United Kingdom [J].Energy Policy 35 (2007) 5481-5495.
4Rumika Chaudhry ,Tarla Rai Peterson Jennie C. Stephens, Elizabeth J. Wilson .Policy stakeholders and deployment of wind power in the sub-national context: A comparison of four U.S. states[J].Energy Policy 38 (2010) 4429-4439 .
5Toke Dave(2002).Wind Power in UK and Denmark: Can Ra- tional Choice Help Explain Different Outcomes? [J].Environmental Politics, 11: 4, 83-100.
6Mitchella, Baukneehtb, Connora. Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2006 ( 3 ) : 297-305.
7Corinna Klessmann, Christian Nabe, Karsten Burges. Pros and cons of exposing renewables to electricity market risksIA comparison of the market integration apprnaehes in Germany, Spain, and the UK[J]. Energy. Policy, 2008( 11 ): 3646-3661.
8Lucy Butler, Karsten Neuhoff. Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development[J]. Renewable Energy,2008(33): 1854- 1867.
9Ivan Diaz-Rainey, John K. Ashton.Stuck between a ROC and a hard place ? Barriers to the take up of green energy in the UK[J]. Energy Policy, 2008(36) : 3043-3051.
