期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

二级计分数据DIF模拟研究的数据产生原理及其软件实现 被引量：1

The Principle of Generating Dichotomous DIF Simulated Responses and the Generating Progress by Softwares
下载PDF
导出
摘要 和基于实测数据的DIF研究相比,基于模拟数据的DIF研究不仅可以自由操纵实验条件,而且可以给出检验力和I型错误指标。本文详细阐述了二级计分DIF模拟数据的产生原理,其产生过程包括四个阶段:选择DIF产生思路,选择项目反应理论模型,确定考生特征、题目特征和复本数,计算考生在题目上的正确作答概率并转化为二级计分数据。并且分别利用常用软件Excel和专业软件WinGen3展示了二级计分DIF模拟数据的产生过程。 Compared to DIF study based on real data, DIF study based on simulated data not only can manipulate the experimental conditions freely, but also provide indicators of power and Type I error. This paper describes the principle of generating dichotomous DIF simulated response, including four phases： choosing the way to introduce DIF, selecting the item response theory model, setting examinee characteristics, item characteristics and number of replications, calculating subject＇ s probability of giving a correct response and transforming it into dichotomous response. The process of generating dichotomous DIF simulated response is showed by using the common software Excel and specialized software WinGen3 separately.
作者 朱乙艺 焦丽亚
机构地区 北京师范大学教育学部教育统计与测量研究所 教育部考试中心评价研发中心
出处 《考试研究》 2012年第6期80-87,19,共9页 Examinations Research
关键词 项目功能差异 模拟研究 Differential Item Functioning, Simulation Study
分类号 G424.74 [文化科学—课程与教学论]
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Angoff, W. H. , Perspectives on Differential Item Functioning Methodology,In Holland, P. W. And Wainer, H. , editors, Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993, 3 - 23.
  • 2漆书青,戴海琦,丁树良,现代教育与心理测量学原理[M],高等教育出版社,2002.
  • 3Han, K.T. , & Hambleton, R. K. , User' s Manual: WinGen ( Center for Educational Assessment Report No. 642), Amherst, MA : University of Massachusetts, School of Education, 2007.
  • 4Sympson, J. B., A Model for Testing with Multidimensional Items, In D. J. Weiss ( Ed. ) , Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference,Minneaplis: University of Minnesola, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program, 1978, 82 - 98.
  • 5董圣鸿,马世晔.三种常用DIF检测方法的比较研究[J].心理学探新,2001,21(1):43-48. 被引量：21
  • 6李付鹏.能力水平分组对Mantel-Haenszel方法检验DIF效应的影响分析[J].中国考试,2011(9):10-15. 被引量：7
  • 7Fidalgo, A. M. , & Mellenhergh, G. J. , Effects of Amount of" DIF, Test Length, and Purification Type on Robustness and Power of Mantel-Haenszel Procedures, Methods of Psychological Research Online ,2000, Vol. 5, No. 3.
  • 8Navas-Ara, M.J., & G6mez- Benito, J., Effects of Ability Scale Purification on the Identification of DIF, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2002, Vol. 18, Issue 1,9 - 15.
  • 9Mark, J. G., Andrea, G., & Keith, A. B., Performance of SIBTEST when the Pereentage of DIF Items is Large, Applied Measurement in Education, 2004,3 (17), 241 -264.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Holland P.W.,Thayer D.T.Differential item performances and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure[M]. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 1988.
  • 2http://www.rasch.org/memo39.pdf.
  • 3Linacre J.M. & Wright B.D.Mantel-Haenszel DIF and PROX are Equivalent[J].Rasch Measurement Transactions, 1989, 3(2):52-53.
  • 4Paek, I. Investigations of differential item functioning: comparisons among approaches, and extension to a multidimensional context [M]. University of California, Berkeley. 2002.
  • 5曾秀芹 孟庆茂.项目功能差异的简介[J].心理学探新,1998,(1).
  • 6教育部考试中心资料室.教育考试图书资料摘编(合订本)[C].1997.
  • 7[11]Hua-Hua Chang, John Mazzeo, Louis Roussos. Detecting DIF for PolytomouslyScored Items: An Adaptation of the SIBTESY Procedure[J] .Journal of EducationalMeasurement, 1996.
  • 8[8][10] Pual W.Holland,Howard Wainer. Differential Item Functioning[M] .1993.
  • 9教育部考试中心主编.1998年派出进修人员学习报告[R].
  • 10William Stout,Louis Roussos. SIBTEST Manual[Z] ,1996.

共引文献24

同被引文献21

  • 1陈平,辛涛.(2011).认知诊断计算杌化自适应测验中的项目增补-以DINA模型为例.博士论文.北京师范大学.
  • 2Brennan, R. L. (2006). Education measurement (4 ed. ). West- port, CT: American Council on Education and Pmeger Pub- lishers.
  • 3de la Torre, J. (2009). DINA model and parameter estimation :A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34 (1),115-130.
  • 4de la Torte, J. , & Douglas, J. A. (2004). Higher - order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 69 ( 3 ), 333 - 353.
  • 5de la Torre, J. (2011). The Generalized DINA Model Frame- work. Psychometaka, 76( 2 ), 179 - 199.
  • 6Flier,H. ,Mellenbergh,G. J. ,Ader,H. J. ,& Wijn,M. (1984). An iterative item bias detection method. Journal of Education- al Measurement,21 (2) ,131 - 145.
  • 7Haertel,E. H. (1989). Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of Edu- cational Measurement ,26(4 ) ,301 - 321.
  • 8Holland,P. W. , & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item per- formance and the Mantel -Haenszel procedure. Test Validity, 129 -145.
  • 9Hou, L. (2013). Differential item functioning assessment in cog- nitive diagnostic modeling:Applying the wald test to investi-gate DIF in the Generalized DINA Model Framework../ournal of Educational Measurement,51 ( 1 ) ,98 - 125.
  • 10Hou, L. , de la Torte, J. , & Nandakumar, R. ( 2014). Differential item functioning assessment in cognitive diagnostic modeling: Application of the wald test to investigate DIF in the DINA Model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51 ( 1 ), 98 - 125.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

考试研究
2012年 第6期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部