期刊文献+

简易重症手足口病评分标准研究 被引量:1

Study on a facility score criteria for serious hand,foot and mouth disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨简易重症手足口病评分标准,为临床医师早期评估病情提供依据。方法选择福建省妇幼保健院2009年危重症手足口病例,并选择部分轻症病例作为对照。参照相关资料制定简易重症手足口病评分标准并对病例进行评分。用ROC曲线对评分标准的诊断价值进行评价。结果重症病例评分≤80分有14例(87.5%),轻症病例评分>80分有117例(69.7%)。重症病例的ROC曲线下面积为0.885。以≤80分定义为重症,其敏感性为0.875,特异性为0.697,约登指数为0.572。结论简易重症手足口病评分标准可早期量化评估病情严重程度,为手足口病分级诊治提供依据。 Objective To explore a facility score criteria for serious hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) cases for clini cian to evaluate serious cases at the earlier period. Methods All serious HFMD cases were selected from hospital during 2009 and some mild cases were random selected as control group. A facility score criteria for serious HFMD was for mulated and the cases were scored based on related literatures. Diagnostic value of score criteria was evaluated by ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve)analysis. Results Totally 14 cases were scored ≤80 points(87.5 %)and 117 ca ses were scored ≤80 points (69.7%). The area under the curve of ROC was 0. 885. When defining a serious cases with ≤80 points, sensitivity, Specificity and Youden's index were 0. 875,0. 697 and 0. 572 respectively. Conclusion The facility score criteria for serious HFMD could well evaluate quantificationally at the earlier period of HFMD and will provide an objective evidence for treatment based on different clinic status.
出处 《海峡预防医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第5期13-15,共3页 Strait Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 手足口病 诊断 重症 评分标准 Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) Diagnosis Serious Cases Score Criteria
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1卫生部办公厅.中国疾病预防控制中心.法定传染病疫情报告[EB/OL][2010-04-21].http://www.chinacdc.cn/n272442/n272530/n272757/.
  • 2卫生部办公厅.手足口病诊疗指南(2010年版)的通知[EB/OL][2010-04-21].http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/mohyzs/s3586/201004/46884.htm.
  • 3卫生部办公厅.肠道病毒71型(EV71)感染重症病例临床救治专家共识(2011年版)[EB/OL][2012-07-23].http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/mohyzs/s3585/201105/51750.htm.
  • 4Rockette HE,King JL, Medina JL, et al. Imaging systems evaluation:effect of subtle cases on the design and analysis of rdceiver operating characterisistic studies [J]. AJR Am J Roentqenol, 1995,165(3) :679-683.
  • 5Chen SP, Huang YC, Li WC, et al. Comparison of clinical features between coxsackievirus A2 and enterovirus 71during the enterovirus outbreak in Taiwan, 2008:a children's hospital experience[J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2010,43(2): 99-104.
  • 6Wang SM, Liu CC. Enterovirus 71: epidemiology, pathogenesis and mangment[J]. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2009,7 (6):735-742.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部