期刊文献+

人下颌骨在不同应变率下的压缩强度 被引量:8

Compression strength of human mandible under different strain rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究下颌骨在不同应变率下的生物力学性质 ,分析应变率和骨密度对压缩强度、弹性模量和破坏应变的影响 .方法 以 5具新鲜男性青年尸体的下颌骨为材料 ,对每具标本进行骨密度测定 ,然后制成标准试件在 INSTRON材料试验机上进行电子压缩 ,应变率分别为 0 .0 0 0 5 ,0 .0 0 5 ,0 .0 5 ,0 .5 s- 1 ,获得不同应变率下的应力 -应变曲线、下颌骨的极限强度、弹性模量以及破坏应变 .应用 Origin5 .0软件在 PC机上进行数据统计和分析 .结果 下颌骨在 0 .0 0 0 5 ,0 .0 0 5 ,0 .0 5 ,0 .5 s- 1的压缩应变率下的极限强度分别为 (10 3± 17) ,(12 0± 15 ) ,(134± 17)和 (15 0± 10 ) MPa;弹性模量分别为 (2 80 0± 189) ,(36 2 7± 34 5 ) ,(42 0 0± 835 )和 (5 12 0±936 ) MPa;破坏应变分别为 (0 .0 6 1± 0 .0 0 6 ) ,(0 .0 5 6±0 .0 0 9) ,(0 .0 5 0± 0 .0 0 9)和 (0 .0 45± 0 .0 10 ) .结论 下颌骨为粘弹性材料 ,其生物力学性质和应变率有密切关系 ,随着应变率数量级增加 ,压缩强度逐渐递增 ,而骨密度和压缩强度呈正相关 . AIM To study the biomechanical behavior of human mandible under different compression strain rates and analyze the relationship between the strain rate and the strength, modulus and ultimate strain. METHODS Com pression tests for human fresh mandible at different strain rates ( ε =0.0005, 0.005, 0.05, 0.5 s -1 ) were performed on INSTRON to acquire the ultimate strength, breaking strain and modulus. The bone density of each individual mandible was measured. Origin 5.0 software was used to analyze all the data. RESULTS The ultimate strength was 103±17, 120±15, 134±17 and 150±10 N/mm 2, the breaking strain was 0.061±0.006, 0.056±0.009, 0.050±0.009 and 0.045±0.010, and the modulus was 2800±189, 3627±345, 4200±835 and 5120±936 N/mm 2 under the above four different strain rates. CONCLUSION The biomechanical behavior of human mandible is closely related with the strain rate and there exists a linear positive relationship between the ultimate strength and the bone density.
作者 薄斌 周树夏
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 2000年第3期261-263,共3页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
基金 国家自然科学基金!(39700163)
关键词 下颌骨 压缩载荷 应变率 极限强度 mandible compression strain rate ultimate strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1薄斌,第四军医大学学报,1999年,20卷,2期,119页
  • 2孙家驹,力学进展,1987年,17卷,2期,200页

同被引文献64

  • 1罗卓荆,胡蕴玉,侯德门,赵婷.牛松质骨力学强度与去抗原处理时限的相关性实验[J].第四军医大学学报,1996,17(6):434-436. 被引量:3
  • 2丁月东.重度口腔颌面创伤的急救与麻醉[J].临床麻醉学杂志,1997,13(1):43-43. 被引量:3
  • 3魏占军 王义生等(译).创伤病人的气道处理[J].国外医学:麻醉学与复苏分册,1991,8(1):27-27.
  • 4Bourauel C, Freudenreich D, Vollmer D, et ah Simulation of orthodontic tooth movements. A comparison of numerical models [J]. J Orofac Orthop, 1999, 60(2):136-151.
  • 5Honda K, Kawashima S, Kashima M, et al. Relationship between sex, age, and the minimum thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa in normal temporomandibular joints [J]. Clin Anat, 2005, 18 (1):23-26.
  • 6Sawazaki R, Lima JS, Asprino L, et al. Incidence and patterns of mandibular condyle fractures[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68 (6):1252-1259.
  • 7Koolstra JH,van Eijden TM. Biomechanical analysis of jaw- closing movements [J]. J Dent Res, 1995, 74(9):1564-1570.
  • 8Langton SG, Saeed SR, Musgrove BT, et al. Deafness and cholesteatoma complicating fracture of the mandibular condyle [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1996, 34(4):286-288.
  • 9Unnewehr M, Homann C, Schmidt PF, et al. Fracture properties of the human mandible [J]. Int J Legal Med, 2003, 117(6):326- 330.
  • 10McElhaney JH, Hopper R J, Nightingale RW, et al. Mechanisms of basilar skull fracture [J]. J Neurotrauma, 1995, 12(4):669-678.

引证文献8

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部