期刊文献+

中心静脉血氧饱和度预测心脏术后患者容量反应性的价值 被引量:4

Central venous oxygen saturation changes in predicting volume responsiveness of mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究中心静脉血氧饱和度变化(△ScvO2)预测心脏术后机械通气患者容量反应性的价值。方法对心脏术后患者29例进行容量负荷试验。通过FIoTrac/Vigileo系统监测心排量(CO)、外周血管阻力指数(SVRI)、每博量变异(SVV)等血流动力学指标。通过中心静脉导管抽血测量中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)。根据容量负荷前后心排量增加值(△CO)是否〉12%分为有反应组和无反应组。通过直线相关回归分析△ScvO2与△CO关系。绘制ROC曲线评价△ScvO2、中心静脉压变化(ACVP)、动脉压变化(△MAP)、容量负荷前SVV预测容量反应性的价值。结果容量负荷后△ScvO2与△CO存在直线相关(r=0.670。P=0.000)。容量负荷后△ScvO2、△CVP、△MAP预测容量反应性曲线下面积分别是0.900(95%C10.777~1,P=0000)、0.450(95%CI0.235~0.665,P-0.647)、0.657(95%C10.455~0.859,P=O.150);SVV曲线下面积0.833(95%CI0.684—0.982,P=0.002)。以△ScvO2取4%作为切点来预测容量反应性,其敏感度929%,特异度8617%。结论AScvO2可以作为预测心脏术后患者容量反应性的可靠指标,而且明显优于CVP、MAP等传统指标。 Objective To assess changes of central venous oxygen saturation ( △ScvO2)in predicting volume respon-siveness of mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Methods A total of 29 mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery were admitted from June 2010 to May 2011. Patients were treated with volume expansion (VE). Cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and stroke volume variation (SVV) were measured with Vigileo/FIoTrac system. ScvO2 was measured before and after volume load through central venous catheter. Responders (R) were defined as patients who increased their CO (△CO)≥12% after VE, and nonresponders (NR) as patients with △CO〈12% after VE. ScvO2 and CO changes after VE were analyzed using linear correlation and regression. The role of △ScvO2, central venous pressure changes (△CVP), mean arterial pressure change (△MAP) and SVV before VE were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves. Results AScvO2 was significantly correlated with△CO after VE (r=0.670, P =0.000). The areas under ROC curves (AUC) were 0.900(95%CI:0.777 - 1, P =0.000 ), 0.450( 95%CI:0.235 - 0.665, P =0.647 ), 0.657( 95%CI:0.455 - 0.859, P =0.150 ) and 0.833 (95%CI:0.684 -0.982, P =0.002)for △ScvO2,△CVP, △MAP and SVV,respectively. △ScvO2 threshold value of 4% allowed the definition of R and NR patients with 92.9% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity. Conclusion △ScvO2 can serve as valid indicator of predicting volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery,and it is more realibale than conventional indicators such as CVP or MAP.
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2012年第20期1640-1643,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
基金 浙江省恩泽医疗中心(集团)基金(12EZD39)
关键词 中心静脉血氧饱和度 心脏手术 容量反应性 容量负荷试验 中心静脉压 每搏量变异 心排量 Central venous oxygen saturation Cardiac surgical Volume responsiveness Volume expansion Cen- tral venous pressure Stroke volume variation Cardiac output
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Krantz T, Warberg J, Secher N H. Venous oxygen saturation during normovolaemic haemodilution in the pig[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2005,49(8): 1149-1156.
  • 2Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B, Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares[J]. Chest,2008,134(1):172-178.
  • 3Magder S. Fluid status and fluid responsiveness [J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2010,16(4):289-296.
  • 4Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge[J]. Crit Care Med,2007,35(1 ):64-68.
  • 5Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf M W, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery : validity of a second generation device[J]. Anesth Analg,2008,106(3):867-872.
  • 6Huang C C, Fu J Y, Hu H C, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure [J]. Crit Care Med, 2008,36(10):2810-2816.
  • 7Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FIoTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients[J]. Anesth Analg,2009,108(2):513-517.
  • 8黄磊,张卫星,蔡文训,罗华,陈映群,张声.每搏量变异度预测严重感染和感染性休克患者容量反应性的价值[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2010,19(9):916-920. 被引量:38
  • 9Giraud R, Siegenthaler N, Gayet-Ageron A, et al. ScvO2As a Marker to Define Fluid Responsiveness[J]. J Trauma, 2010, 70(4):802- 807.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Osman D,Ridel C,Ray P,et al.Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict nomodynamic response to volume challenge[J].Crit Care Med,2007,35(1):64-68.
  • 2Monnet X,Teboul JL.Volume responsiveness[J].Curr Opin Crit Care,2007,13(5):549-553.
  • 3Durairaj L,Schmidt GA.Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis:less is more[J].Chest,2008,133(1):252-263.
  • 4Zimmermann M,Feibicke T,Keyl C,et al.Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2010,27(6):555-561.
  • 5Hofer CK,Senn A,Weibel L,et al.Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTracTMand PiCCOplusTM system[J].Critcal Care,2008,12(3):82.
  • 6Levy MM,Fink MP,Marshall JC,et al.2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference[J].Crit Care Med,2003,31(4):1250-1256.
  • 7van Lelyveld-Haas LE,van Zanten AR,Borm GF,et al.Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1 A in critically ill patients[J].Eur J Anesthesiol,2008,25(11):917-924.
  • 8Phillips R,Lichtenthal P,Sloniger J,et al.Noninvasive cardiac output measurement in heart failure subjects on circulatory support[J].Anesth Analg,2009,108(3):881-886.
  • 9Marik PE,Baram M,Vahid B.Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness ?:A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares[J].Chest,2008,134(1):172-178.
  • 10Cavallaro F,Sandroni C,Antonelli M.Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness[J].Minerva Anestesiol,2008,74(4):123-135.

共引文献37

同被引文献52

  • 1Barr J, Fraser, Gilles L, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for theManagement of pain, Agitation and Delirium in Adult Patients in the intensive Care Unit[J]. Critical care medicine, 2013, 41(1):278- 280.
  • 2Sanfilippo F, Corredor C, Fletcher N, et al. Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 32(6): 799-807.
  • 3Backer D, Taccone F S, Holsten R, et al. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients [J]. Anesthesiology, 2009, 110(5):1092-1097.
  • 4da Silva Ramos F J, de Oliveira E M, Park M, et al. Heart-lung interactions with different ventilatory settings during acute lung in- jury and hypovolaemia: an experimental study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011, 106(3):394-402.
  • 5De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon, Salgado D, et al. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patients=current methods and future approaches[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2010, 36(11 ):1813- 1825.
  • 6Akelli B. Inferior vena cava diameter as a marker of early hemorrhagic shock: a comparative study[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2010,16(2) : 113-118.
  • 7Arnold RC, Shapiro NI, Jones AE, et al. Multicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in pa- tients with presumed sepsis[J]. Shock, 2009,32( 1 ) : 35-39.
  • 8De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon,Salgado D,et al. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patients:current methods and future approaches[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2010,36( 11 ): 1813-1825.
  • 9Nebout S, Pirracchio R. Should we monitor ScvO(2) in critically ill patients?[J]. Cardiol Res Pract, 2012, 2012: 370697. DOI:10,1155/2012/370697.
  • 10Shepherd SJ, Pearse RM. Role of central and mixed venous oxygen saturation measurement in perioperative care [J]. Anesthesiology, 2009, 111(3): 649-456.

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部