摘要
奥斯特罗姆的研究揭示:相比大城市的警察机构,地方社群控制的警察机构的产出水平更高,效率更高,更能满足公民的需要;大都市地区警察服务的生产者具有多样性,几乎不存在严格意义上的重复生产;不同层次的警察机构之间存在着丰富的关系网络,使得辅助服务被普遍地使用;机构规模的多样性和服务的不同组合,并不必然产生服务的浪费和混乱;交叉管辖背景下跨辖区警察组织的合作具有普遍性,且非正式(不成文)合作非常容易实现;警察绩效与正式合作协议的数量负相关;与非正式协议的数量正相关;绩效测量应该是一种学习更好地了解警察做什么和在其社区有什么影响效果的途径,在提出更好的问题方面比给出更好的答案方面更有用。奥斯特罗姆的理论的政策选择对于当下中国的公安警察改革和警察服务的组织具有深远的指导和借鉴意义。
The 2009 Nobile Prize winner Elinor Ostrom and her colleagues started a research on police service for 15 years in the argument of Metropolitan Reform. The industrial perspective rather than the organizational perspective of police service allows a new approach to understanding the patterns and orders of police service in metropolitan areas. They examined the internal and external validity of polycentric order, auto-network and its effectiveness,and verified or falsified the relation between police performance and the numbers and scales of police organizations,as well as the relation between police performance and police organization structure. Their efforts were accomplished through research methods of in-depth case analysis and large sample analysis,and through constant attention to themes such as community organizations and police service,patterns of police service in metropolitan areas,inter-jurisdictional cooperation and police performance.
出处
《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2012年第5期7-15,共9页
Journal of People’s Public Security University of China:Social Sciences Edition
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"跨区域警务合作的模式与绩效:来自中国的实证研究"(项目编号:FRF-TP-12-127A)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
多中心
自主治理
公共经济
警察服务
跨域治理
Poly-centricity, self-governance, public economy, police service, inter-jurisdictional cooperation