期刊文献+

面神经后入路振动声桥圆窗植入术治疗小耳畸形 被引量:1

The Vibrant Soundbridge Implantation in Round Window via Retro-FaciaI-Nerve Approach in a Patient with Congenital Microtia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨双侧小耳畸形合并耳道骨性闭锁患者。面神经垂直段后进路振动声桥植入的可行性和术后效果。方法1例双耳先天小耳畸形合并耳道骨性闭锁患者,左耳传导性耳聋,右耳混合性聋,语频区平均骨气导差为55dB。Jahrsdoerfer评分患者左侧为5分。右侧为4分。双侧面神经后进路开放骨性隧道,一期双耳振动声桥圆窗植入。结果双耳面神经后进路振动声桥圆窗植入。术后2.5个月开机使用。声场测听语频区左耳听阈平均40dBHL。右耳平均听阈39dBHL,双耳气导听阈降低15~16dBHL。开放式汉语单声母、韵母言语识别率为98%。结论面神经后进路开放骨性隧道暴露圆窗行振动声桥圆窗植入术治疗小耳畸形,听力改善较为理想。 Objective To explore the feasibility and postoperative outcome of vibrant soundbridge implantation via the retro-facial nerve approach in patients with bilateral microtia and bony aural atresia. Methods A patient with bilateral microtia and bony aural atresia was involved in this study. The patient had conductive deafness in the left ear and mixed deafness in the right ear and the air-bone gap was 55 dB at the speech frequency. The Jahrsdoerfer score of left ear was 5 and that of right ear was 4. The bony tunnel was opened behind the facial nerve and vibrant soundbridges were implanted in round window bilaterally. Results The vibrant soundbridges were implanted bilaterally via the retro-facial nerve approach. The device was switched on 2.5 months after the surgery. The hearing threshold at the speech frequency was 40 dB HL for the left ear and 39 dE} HL for the right ear. The binaural air-conduction thresholds were increased by 15-16 dE} HL. The open-set speech recognition score of Chinese single initial consonants and vowels was 98%. Conclusion After receiving the vibrant soundbridge implantation in round window via the retro-facial nerve approach, the patient with bilateral microtia and bony aural atresia shows obvious improvement in hearing.
出处 《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》 2012年第6期443-445,共3页 Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation
关键词 先天小耳畸形 双耳道骨性闭锁 振动声桥 面神经后进路 Congenital microtia Bony aural atresia Vibrant soundbridge Retro-facial- nerve approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Magnan J,Manrique M,Dillier N,et al. International consensus on middle ear implants. Acta Otolaryngol,2005, 125: 920- 921.
  • 2Luetje CM,Brackman D,Balkany TJ,et al. Phase Ill clinical trial results with the Vibrant Soundbridge implantable middle ear hearing device:a prospective controlled mul'~iceeter study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2002,126(2): 97 107.
  • 3Todt L, Seidl if, O, Ernst A. Hearig benefit of patients afterVibrant soundbrige. Off, L J Otorhinolaryngol 1relat Spec, 2005, 67(4): 205-206.
  • 4WoHenberg B, Beltrame M, Schonweiler R, et al. Integration of the active mfddle ear implant vibrant soundbridge fn total atlricular reconstrction. HNO, 2007, 55(5): 349-556.
  • 5sterkers O, Boucarra D,Labassi S, et al. A middle ear implant, the Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge: retrospectfve study of the first ]25 patients implanted in France. Otol Neurotol,2003, 24(3): 427-456.
  • 6Gan P,Z,Wood MW, Ball GP, et al. lmplantable hearing device performance measured by laser Doppler interferometry. Ear Nose Throat J, 1997, 76(5): 297-299, 502, 505- 509.
  • 7Fraysse B, Lavieille JP, Schmerber S, et al. A multicenter study of the vibrant soundbridge middle ear implant: early clinical results and experience. Otol Neurotol, 2001, 22(6): 952-96.
  • 8Jahrsdoerfer PA, Yeakley jw, Aguilar EA, et al.Gradfng system for the selection of patients 'with congenital aural atresia[J]. Am J Otol, 1992,15(1 ): 6-12.

同被引文献24

  • 1Huber AM, Ball GR, Veraguth D, et al. A new implantable middle ear hearing device for mixed hearing loss: a feasibility study in human temporal bones[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2006, 27 (8) : 1104-1109.
  • 2Luetje CM, Brackman D, Balkany TJ, et al. Phase III clinical trial results with the Vibrant Soundbridge implantable middle ear hearing device: a prospective controlled multicenter study[J]. OtolaryngolHeadNeckSurg, 2002, 126 (2) : 97-107.
  • 3Tsang WS, Yu JK, Wong TK, et al. Vibrant Soundbridge system: application of the stapes coupling technique[J]. J Laryngol, 2013, 127 (1) : 58-62.
  • 4Fisch U, Cremers CW, Lenarz T, et al. Clinical experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge implant device[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2001, 22 (6) : 962-972.
  • 5Streitberger C, Perotti M, Beltrame MA, et al. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery[J]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rbinol (Bord) , 2009, 130 (2) : 83- 88.
  • 6Bruschini L, Forli F, Giannarelli M, et al. Exclusive transcanal surgical approach for Vibrant Soundbridge implantation: surgical and functional results[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2009, 30 (7) : 950- 955.
  • 7Verhaegen V J, Mulder J J, Noten JF, et al. Intraoperative auditory steady state response measurements during Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implantation in patients with mixed hearing loss: preliminary results[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2010, 31 (9) : 1365-1368.
  • 8Karkas A, Chahine K, Schmerber S. The benefit of the reverse transfer function in the fitting process of the Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant[J].Acta Otolaryngol, 2012, 132 (2) : 173- 178.
  • 9Bal GR. The vibrant soundbridge., design and development[J]. AdvOtorhinolaryngol, 2010, 69: 1-13.
  • 10Pok SM, Schlegel M, B/Sheim K. Clinical experience with the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge in sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 2010, 69: 51-58.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部