摘要
本文拟在厘清哈维建构历史—地理唯物主义理论思路的基础上,认为哈维属于晚期马克思主义理论家,并通过对比研究他与后马克思主义思潮的异同,凸显其理论特质和彰显其理论贡献。哈维始终坚持以生产方式为核心的历史唯物主义分析框架,从空间的视角揭示出晚期资本主义社会仍然是受资本逻辑支配,其阶级关系并没有发生本质改变。因此,作为晚期马克思主义重要代表的哈维没有像后马克思主义那样走向后现代主义政治,同时他开拓了历史唯物主义的理论空间。
David Harvey is a theoretician of Later-Marxism. This article is intended to clarify his basic idea to construct the theory of historical-geographical materialism, and to compare his theory of historical-geographical materialism with Later-Marxism and Post-Marxism, so as to highlight its theoretical characteristics and Harvey' s theoretical contribution. Through a comparative study, we believe that, Harvey always adhered to historical materialism and Marx' s class theory, and from the spatial perspective, we reveal that late capitalist society is still dominated by the capital logic, so its class relations failed to change essentially. Therefore, as an important representative of Later-Marxism, Harvey not only adhered to the basic stance of historical materialism, but also opened up the new theoretical space for historical materialism, thus enriching and developing Marxism in the new historical conditions.
出处
《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第6期57-63,共7页
Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)