期刊文献+

“肌壁大部切除-子宫重建术”治疗中、重度子宫腺肌病的术式与安全性探讨 被引量:16

Surgery and safety exploration on treatment of adenomyosis by major uterine wall resection and reconstruction of the uterus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨"肌壁大部切除-子宫重建术"治疗中、重度子宫腺肌病的安全性和手术相关问题。方法采用MURU治疗32例中、重度子宫腺肌病患者,对MURU手术方式,手术时间、出血量、并发症及手术效果进行观察、分析。结果 32例病人MURU均获成功,平均手术时间、出血量、住院时间分别为:85.56±25.34 min、61.27±25.47 mL、4.60±0.57 d。术前病人子宫平均体积:268.52±98.75 cm3;切除子宫肌壁的平均重量、体积分别为:315.45±72.36 g、282.43±151.67 cm3。与正常育龄妇女子宫比较,MURU术后子宫平均体积缩小约4.28倍;切除肌壁的重量为正常子宫重量的5.28倍。结论 MURU安全性好,手术切除范围广泛,可用于中、重度子宫腺肌病保留子宫治疗的研究。 Objective To explore the clinical safety and therapeutic effects of major uterine wall resec- tion and reconstruction of the uterus (MURU) on the moderate and severe adenomyosis. Methods Thirty -two patients with moderate or severe adenomyosis were selected. The operation pattern and time, the bleeding amount, complications and surgery efficacy were investigated and analyzed. Results Thirty - two patients were successfully treated with MURU. The average operation time, bleeding amount and hospital duration were 85.56 _± 25.34 min, 61.27 ± 25.47 mL and 4.60 ± 0.57 d, respectively. The average uterine volumes before MURU were 268.52 ± 98.75 cm3. The mean weight and volumes of the resected uterine walls by MURU were 315.45 ± 72.36 g and 282.43 ± 151.67 cm3, respec- tively. Compared with the normal uterus in gestational age, the average uterine volumes were reduced a- bout 4.28 times and the weight of the resected uterine walls was increased 5.28 times after MURU. Conclusion MURU could be safely used in the treatment of moderate and severe adenomyosis with uterus reserving therapy.
出处 《遵义医学院学报》 2012年第4期302-305,共4页 Journal of Zunyi Medical University
关键词 肌壁大部切除-子宫重建术 腺肌病 曼月乐 治疗 MURU adenomyosis IUS treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Yang J - H,Ho H - N, Yang Y - S. Current diagnostic andtreatment strategies for adenomyosis. Expert Rev [ J]. Ob-stet Gynecol,2006,1 : 111.
  • 2郞景和.子宫内膜异位症的基础与临床研究[M].中国协和医科大学出版社,2003.
  • 3G ter Haar,I Rivens,L Chen, et al High Intensity FocusedUltrasound for the treatment of rat tumors [ J]. Phys MedBiol,1991,36:1405 -1501.
  • 4SiskinG P,Tublin ME,Stainken B F,et al Uterine arteryembolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: clinical re-sponse and evaluation with MR imaging [ J]. Am J Roent-genol, 2001,77 : 297.
  • 5PagedasA C,Boe I H,Perkins H E. Review of 24 cases ofuterine ablation failure [ J]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Lapa-rosc,1995,2:239.
  • 6Bohlman M E, Ensor R E, Sanders R C. Sonographic find-ings in adenomyosis of the uterus[ J] . Am J Roentgenol,1987,148:765.
  • 7McCausland A M, McCausland V M. Depth of endometrialpenetration in adenomyosis helps determine outcome ofrollerball ablation [ J] . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996,174:1786.
  • 8Loffer F D. Endometrial ablation and resection [ J] . CurrOpin Obstet Gynecol,1995,7 :290.
  • 9SperoffL, Glass R H, Kase N G. The uterus. ClinicalGynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility [ M]. 6th ed.Baltimore, Md; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.Chapter 4.
  • 10Laughlin G A,Barrett — Connor E, Kritz - Silver^tein D, etal Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and endogenous sexhormone levels in older women : the Rancho BernardoStudy[ J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2000,85 (2) : 645 -651.

同被引文献140

引证文献16

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部