《普通逻辑》教材第十三章中的一处知识缺陷

Analyzing a Flaw in Chapter 13 of General Logic

借助对比,剖析了《普通逻辑论证的评估》的＂半途而废,不置可否＂的缺陷,该书的《论证的评估》一节对于一个包含错误推理的论证止步于介绍其推理结构,却没有指出它的论证强度为谬误。

This paper,by comparison,analyzes the flaw of ＂doing things by halves and being non-committal＂ in Evaluation of Argument,General Logic.The flaw goes as follows： such section of the textbook stops the argument of a false inference at introducing its inference structure without pointing out the fallacy of its argument intensity.