摘要
针对学界对郭麐皆从师姚鼐、袁枚的说法,本文通过厘清郭麐与姚、袁二人的交游情况,认为姚鼐为郭麐业师,而与袁枚无正式的师生关系。在文学上,郭麐对袁枚"性灵"说多所继承,对姚鼐的桐城文法和诗法则有微言,在对二人文学主张的取舍中形成崇尚性情、追求自然、卓然自立的早期文学思想。这种文学思想的形成与其自负、自立的个性和对乾嘉时期桐城文派的理性估衡有着莫大的关系。
This paper aims to clarify Guo Lin's scholastic activities with Yao Nai and Yuan Mei, and concluded that Yao was Guo Lin's teacher and advisor, while he had no formal student-teacher relationship with Yuan. Guo Lin mostly inherited Yuan's Xingling 性灵 (Native Sensibility) in literary practice, however, he disagreed with Yao's Tongcheng prose and poetry style. Influenced by these two scholars' literary view- points, Guo formed his unique literary ideology, characterized by worshiping Native Sensibility, pursing na- ture, independence. There is a strong connection between the formation of literary ideology; egotistic and in- dependent character j and rational evaluation of Tongeheng School during Qianlong and Jiaqing periods.
出处
《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第6期87-93,共7页
Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
郭麐
姚鼐
袁枚
交游
文学思想
Guo Lin, Yao Nai, Yuan Mei, Companionship, Literary Ideology