期刊文献+

王源《左传评》之“虚实”、“错综”文法

The “Emptiness and Fullness” and “Intricacy” Grammar in Zuo Commentary by Wang Yuan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 王源对《左传》中"虚实"、"错综"文法的评点可谓独出心裁,形成了自己的一套理论体系。其"虚实"文法主要体现在三个方面:"虚"处传神;"虚"、"实"结合;关于写真的问题。而"错综"文法则是使文章结构充满变化的最重要的表现手段之一,并且探究了"以整齐为错综"的特殊章法现象。 The remarks on the " emptiness and fullness" and " intricacy" grammar in Zuo Commentary by Wang Yuan are of ingenuity, forming a series of theoretical systems of its own. His "emptiness and fullness" grammar mainly lies in three aspects: vividness in "emptiness", combination of emptiness with fullness, and authentic writing. However, the " intricacy" grammar is one of the most important expressive approaches to make article structure full of change. This paper explores the special art of composition of "taking orderliness as intricacy. "
作者 顾明佳
出处 《绵阳师范学院学报》 2012年第10期64-67,共4页 Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
关键词 王源 左传评 虚实 错综 Wang Yuan Zuo Commentary emptiness and fullness intricacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1戴钧衡编.方望溪先生全集.四君子传[M].台北:文海出版社,1970.
  • 2赵则诚等编.中国古代文学理论辞典[M].长春:吉林文史出版社,1985.
  • 3袁行霈编.中国文学史[M].北京:髙等教育出版社,1999.
  • 4王源.左传评[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1997.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部