司法强拆的法律修辞学解读

An Interpretation of Forensic Rhetorics on Judicial Enforcement in Regulations on the Expropriation of Houses on State-owned Land

法律修辞学的核心在于其"听众理论"。"司法强拆"作为一种从司法到立法的全方位的法律修辞,其听众有以下三类:(1)普遍听众,即为社会大众。(2)单一听众,即具体案件当中的当事人。(3)说理者本身,即国家行政机关。而作为法律修辞的"司法强拆"的立法旨趣仅仅在于通过对三种听众进行分化,争取大多数的与具体案情没有直接关系的社会大众,在现有框架下尽量保证部分听众之间的局部矛盾不会轻而易举的膨胀并发酵为其他矛盾。这种修辞存在概念的不稳定性、价值初衷的功利性、实践的颠覆性等三方面实务操作困境,但即便如此,"司法强拆"依然存在增量意义。

Forensic rhetorics centers on the Rationale of Adherence of Audience. The Judicial Enforcement, as a genre of forensic rhetorics, has three kinds of audience, namely ： a. universal audience, which is the public ; b. particular audience, which are those involved in the affairs; c. orator himself, which is the enforcing agency. The tragedy of the enforcement as rhetoric is to separate the three kinds of audiences by dragging the public to their side and freezeing the contradiction with the particular audience. However unstable, cynical and uncertain, it a- mount to a settlement of the present problems.