期刊文献+

两种不同长度切口超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶体植入术的疗效分析 被引量:5

Analysis on Therapeutic Effect of Cataract Phacoemulsification Joint Intraocular Lens Implantation by Two Different Lengths of Incision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价2.2 mm与2.8 mm两种角膜缘小切口超声乳化白内障吸除联合折叠式人工晶状体植入术对术后疗效的影响。方法将251例(251只眼)白内障患者,按照2.2 mm与2.8 mm两种不同大小角膜缘切口随机分为两组:A组132例(132只眼),B两119例(119只眼),两组均行角膜缘小切口超声乳化白内障吸除联合折叠式人工晶状体植入术,比较两组术后视力、超声乳化时间、手术时间及并发症等情况。结果两组患者术前、术后1周、1个月和3个月的裸眼及矫正视力比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组Ⅱ、Ⅲ级核的超声乳化时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而B组Ⅳ级核的超声乳化时间少于A组(P<0.05);两组各级核硬度的手术时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在白内障超声乳化吸除联合折叠式人工晶状体植入术中,2.2 mm角膜缘切口是一种安全有效的手术切口。 Objective To evaluate the influence of 2.2 mm and 2.8 mm cornea small incisions on the postoperative effect of phacoemulsification cataract joint intraocular lens implantation.Methods 251 cases(251 eyes)cataract patients were randomly divided into two groups of A(132 eyes)and B(119 eyes)according to the 2.2 mm and 2.8 mm,corneal limbal incision phacoemulsification with posterior foldable intraocular lens implantation were done on the two groups visual acuity,phacoemulsification time,operation time and complications,etc.of the two groups were compared.Results There were no significant differences in the corrected visual acuity in preoperative,postoperative week 1,month 1 and month 3 between the two groups(P0.05).There were no significant differences in the nuclear level Ⅱ and Ⅲ ultrasonic emulsification time between the two groups(P0.05),while the ultrasonic emulsification time of level Ⅳ nuclear in B group was significantly shorter than that in group A(P0.05).There were no significant differences in the operation time between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion In cataract phacoemulsification plus foldable intraocular lens implantation,2.2 mm corneal limbal incision is a safe and effective approach.
出处 《医学综述》 2012年第22期3885-3887,共3页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 超声乳化白内障吸除 角膜缘切口 折叠式 视力 Cataract phacoemulsification Corneal limbal incision Folding Vision
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1Ernest P, Rhem M, McDermott M, et al. Phacoemulsiflcation conditions resulting in thermal wound injury. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2001, 27:1829-1839.
  • 2Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS. New phacoemulsification technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 28:1054-1060.
  • 3Pereira AC, Porfirio F Jr, Freitas LL, et aL Ultrasound energy and endothelial cell loss with stop-and-chop and nuclear preslice phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006, 32: 1661- 1666.
  • 4Davison JA. Ultrasonic power reduction during phacoemulsitication using adjunctive NeoSoniX technology. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, 31 : 1015-1019.
  • 5Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS. Power modulations in new phacoemulsification technology: improved outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30 : 1014-1019.
  • 6Gimbel HV, Sofinski SJ, Kurteeva K, et al. AdvanTec Legacy System and the NeoSoniX handpiece. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2003, 14:31-34.
  • 7Vasavada AR, Raj SM, Lee YC. NeoSoniX ultrasound versus ultrasound alone for phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30:2332-2335.
  • 8Jiraskova N, Rozsival P. Phacoemulsification parameters., series 20000 Legacy Versus Legacy with AdvanTec software and NeoSoniX handpiece. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30: 144- 148.
  • 9Sekundo W,Boker T,Fimmers R.Induced corneal astigmatism using anasymmetric corneoscleral tunnel and a large optic intraocular lens[J].JCataract Refract Surg,2000,26(1):79-82.
  • 10Cavallini GM,,Lugli N,,Campi L,,et al.Surgically induced astigmatism after manual extracapsular cataract extraction or after phacoemul-sification procedure[J].Eur J Ophthalmol,1996,6:257-263.

共引文献23

同被引文献45

  • 1陈冬芳,杨丽红,马伊.透明角膜切口位置对老年性白内障患者术后角膜散光的影响[J].山东医药,2013,53(45):57-58. 被引量:7
  • 2范伟杰,鲍宁,陶黎明,陈逖.手法小切口白内障术中后囊破裂原因与处理[J].眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2006,28(4):259-261. 被引量:39
  • 3Yamaguchi T, Ohnuma K ,Tomida D. The contribution of the posterior surface to the corneal aberrations in eyes keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei,2011,52 :6222-6229.
  • 4Cheng LS ,Tsai CY,Tsai RJ ,et al. Estimation accuracy of surgically induced astigmatism on the cornea when neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Acta Ophthalmol, 2011,89: 417- 422.
  • 5Alio JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D. Corneal optical quality following sub 1.8 mm micro-Incision cataract surgery vs. 2.2 mm mini-Incision coaxial phacoemulsifcatoin. Jorge L Alio,2010,17:94-99.
  • 6Hayashi K, Tsunl T, Yoshida M, et al. Intraocular pressure and wound status in eyes immediately after scleral tunnel incision and clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol, 2014, 158:232-241.
  • 7Kawahara A, Kurosaka D, YoshidaA. Comparison of Surgically induced astigmatism between one-handed and two-handed cataract surgeu, techniques. Clin Ophthahnol,2013,19 : 1967-1972.
  • 8Abell RG, AUen PL, Vote BJ. Anterior chamber flare after femto- second laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refracl Surg, 2013,39:1321-1326.
  • 9Lowry EA, Poreo TC, NaseriA. Cost analysis of virtual-reality phacoemul sification simulation in ophthalmology training programs. J Cataract Refract Surg,2013,39:1616-1617.
  • 10Serrao S, Lombardo G, Ducoli P, et al. Evaluation of femtosecond laser clear corneal incision : an experimental study. J Refract Surg,2013 ,29 :418-424.

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部