2Amsterdamska et al. 2008. Medical Science in the Light of a Flawed Study of the Holocaust: A Comment on Eva Hedfors' Paper on Ludwik Fleck. Social Studies of Science. 38(6): 937 - 944.
3- v Babich, B. E. 2003a. From Fleck' s Denkstil to Kuhn's paradigm: Conceptual schemes and incommensurability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 17(1):75 - 92.
4Babich, B. E. 2003b. Kuhn' s paradigm as a parable for the Cold War: incommensurability and its discontents from Fuller' s Tale of Harvard to Fleck' s Unsung Lvov. Social Epistemology." A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy. 17:99 - 109.
5Brorson, S. Ludwik Fleck on proto-ideas in medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 3: 147-152.
6Brorson, S. and Andersen, H. 2001. Stabilizing and Changing Phenomenal Worlds: Ludwik Fleck and Thomas Kuhn on Scientific Literature. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschriftfur allgemeine Wissenschaflstheorie. 32(1): 109 - 129.
7Bunge, M. 1981. [Book Review]Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact(1979). Behavioral Science. 26:178 - 180.
8Elkana, Y. 1986. "Is There a Distinction Between External and Internal Sociology of Science? (Commentary on a paper by John Ziman)." See Cohen and Schnelle, pp. 309 - 323.
9Fleck, L. 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10Fleck, L. 1980. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einfuhrung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv (suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft). Schafer, L., Schnelle, T.(Hrsg.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
