期刊文献+

吸引子角度的冲突观 被引量:1

To understand conflict from the perspective of attractor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 动力学理论最初是由自然科学发展而来,最后被引入到社会科学中为冲突的理解与解决带来新的角度。在冲突的动力学观点下,一个比较重要的概念是吸引子,是一种形象的比拟,为理解与解决冲突提供了一种新的视角。文章在对冲突研究进行回顾的基础上,介绍吸引子视角下的冲突观。首先,回顾了冲突研究的发展。然后,运用吸引子的概念介绍动力学思想下的冲突观和解决策略。最后,评述吸引子的概念在冲突的理解以及解决的意义。 The dynamic theory was first developed from natural science, and then was introduced into social science area. And the dynamism brought special new ideas and insight for conflict understanding and re- solving. One of the important concepts coming from the dynamic theory was attractor. Attractor which provided useful way of inspecting conflicts was a metaphor to describe the dynamics within a system. This 'article would explain the conflict theory under the attractor perspective based on the review of traditional conflict ideas. First began with the review of the development of conflict researches. Then demonstrated the conflict' s dynamic with the help of attractor. Finally, some com- ments over the attractor concept and dynamic ideas would be made.
出处 《社会心理科学》 2012年第11期30-35,共6页 Science of Social Psychology
关键词 冲突 动力学 吸引子 conflict dynamic attractor
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1李小平.从动力学的观点看冲突和冲突的干预[J].江苏社会科学,2011(2):15-21. 被引量:7
  • 2Deutsch, M. (2002). Social Psychology' s Contributions to the study of conflict resolution, Negotiation Journal,18, 307-320.
  • 3Nowak, A. & Vallacher, R. R. (1998).?Dynamical social psychology (pp. 10-20).?New York: Guilford Press.
  • 4李小平.(2010).冲突研究的新视角:一个动力学的观点.(待发表).
  • 5Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R.R, Nowak, A. , & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2007). Intractable conflict as an attractor: A dynamical systems approach to conflict escalation and intractability. American Behavioral Scientist, 50 (11), 1454-1475.
  • 6李小平.(2005).非线性科学及其在心理学中的应用.南京师范大学学报,2,113-114.
  • 7Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Psychology Monographs, 131,285-360.
  • 8Vallacher, R. R., Read, S. J., & Nowak, A. (2002). The dynamical perspective in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 264-273.
  • 9Liebovitch, S. A., Vallacher.R,. Nowak,A., Bui-Wrzosinska,L., Bartoli,A., & Coleman,P. T. (2008) Dynamics of two-actor cooperation-competition conflict models. Physica A 387:6360-6378.
  • 10Coleman, P. T., Bartoli, A., Chung, C., Nets, R., & Gelfand, M. (2009). Surveying Attractor Landscapes for conflict: Investigating the relationship between conflict, culture and complexity Paper presented at the 22nd Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference in ,Kyoto, Japan, June, 2009.

二级参考文献32

  • 1杜晓燕.基于反应时范式的内隐态度测量及其方法学思考[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,37(S1):155-157. 被引量:2
  • 2http.//attractorsoft-ware.org.
  • 3Tutorial Attractor Software, http./Iwww.iccc.edu.pllas/2as.pdf.
  • 4韦德里希、哈格原.《定量社会学》,郭治安等编译,[成都]四川人民出版社1986年版,第53-108页.
  • 5Baston, C.D., & Ahmad, N., (2001). Empathy-induced al- truism in a prisoner's dilemma II . What if the target of empathy has defected? European Journal of Social Psychology, 31,25-36.
  • 6Coleman, P.T. (2000). Intractable conflict. In M. Deutsch & P.T. Coleman(Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution. Theory and practices. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
  • 7Coleman, P.T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, in- tractable conflict. Towards the development of a meta-framework-- I, Journal of Peace Psychology,9(1), 1-37.
  • 8Coleman, P.T. (2004). Paradigmatic framing of protracted, intractable conflict. Towards the development of a meta-framework. Part II. Journal of Peace Psychology, 10(3), 197-235.
  • 9Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallacher, R., & Nowak, A. (2006). Protracted con?icts as dynamical systems. In The negotiator's ?eldbook (pp. 61-74), edited by A. Schneider and C. Honeyman. Chicago, IL. American Bar Association.
  • 10Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A. & Bui-Wr- zosinska, L. (2007). Intractable conflict as an attractor. A dynamical systems approach to conflict escalation and intractability. American Behavioral Scientist, 50( 11 ), 1454-1475.

共引文献6

同被引文献23

  • 1李小平.(2005).非线性科学及其在心理学中的应用.南京师范大学学报,2,113-114.
  • 2李小平.(2013b)动力学视角下的冲突解决策略.南京师范大学学报(即将发表).
  • 3Coleman, P. T. (2006).Conflict, Complexity, and Change. A Meta-Framework for addressing protracted intractable conflicts-Ⅲ, Journal ot I Peace Psychology, 12,325-348.
  • 4Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallach- er, R.R., & Nowak, A. (2006). Protracted conflicts as dynamical systems. The negotiator' s fieldbook (pp. 61-74), Chicago, IL. American Bar Association.
  • 5Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R.R., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2007). Intractable conflict as an attractor. A dynamical systems approach to conflict escalation and intractability. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1454-1475.
  • 6Coleman, P. T., Bartoli, A., Chung, C., Nets, R., & Gelfand, M. (2009). Surveying Attractor Land- scapes for conflice Investigating the relationship be- tween conflict, culture and complexity .Paper presented at the 22nd Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference in ,Kyoto, Japan, June, 2009.
  • 7Coleman, P. T., VaUacher, R. R., Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., & Bartoli, A. (2010). Navi- gating the landscape of conflict. Applications of dy- namical systems theory to protracted social conflict. Systemic Thinking and Conflict Transformation (pp. 39-56), Berlin, Germany.
  • 8Cross. S. & Rosenthal, R. (1999).Three models of conflict resolution. Effects on intergroup experiencies and attitudes.Journal of Social Issues,55 (3), 561-580.
  • 9Deutsch, M. (2002). Social psychology' s contributions to the study of conflict resolution. Ne- gotiation Journal, 18, 307-320.
  • 10Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005) New developments in social interdependence theory.Psychology Monographs, 131,285-360.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部