期刊文献+

诉讼和解的逻辑——和解、效率与谈判能力 被引量:5

Conciliation,Efficiency and Negotiation Ability in Settlement of Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国内外学界对诉讼和解的研究主要集中在诉讼和解的发生问题上,对诉讼和解的公平与效率问题尚没有系统的研究。当事人的谈判能力不仅影响诉讼和解的发生,也强有力地影响诉讼和解份额的确定。现实需求的迫切性导致处于经济劣势地位的当事人的贴现率非常低,进而极大地削弱了其谈判能力,而不对等的谈判能力导致低谈判能力当事人接受一个不公平的和解份额。在经济学的意义上,这进一步扭曲了社会经济活动中风险预防的效率。在诉讼和解实践中,很多处于经济优势地位的当事人滥用诉讼权利恶意拖延诉讼或者恶意逼讼,从而导致弱势地位的当事人的权利被打折。所以应当建立诉讼权利滥用惩罚机制,创新能动司法机制,平衡各方诉讼当事人的谈判能力,从而消除司法实践中不合理的贴现效应。 Issues of how legal negotiations take place as they instigate legal negotiation or settlement of litigation have been the focus of research at home and abroad. However, little efforts are made in the sys- tematic study of cooperative surplus allocation. In fact, negotiation abilities of parties involved have effects on both the occurrence and the determination of shares in the legal negotiation. In practice, the e- conomically - underprivileged has low discount rate which is unfairly made use of by the economically - advantaged. Imbalance in negotiation ability results in injustice in conciliation, which leads to low effi- ciency in risk precaution in economic activities. Therefore, punishment mechanism must be established for abuse of litigation rights and innovations have to be introducedto make the judicial system dynamic.
作者 袁建刚 侯纯
出处 《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期126-136,共11页 Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 河北省社会科学基金项目(HB10HFX075)
关键词 诉讼和解 谈判能力 贴现率 settlement of litigation negotiation ability discount rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Gerald R. Williams, Negotiation as a Healing Process, Disp. Resol. ,no. 1,1996,p.2.
  • 2Herb Ross, Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation in the Federal Courts Began in 10s,AK Bar Rag. , vol. 31,2007 ,p. 1.
  • 3Herb Ross, Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation in the Federal Courts Began in 70s, AK Bar Rag. ,vol. 31,2007,p. 1.
  • 4Herb Ross, Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation in the Federal Courts Began in 10stAK Bar Rag. , vol. 31,2007 ,p. 1.
  • 5武红羽《司法调解的生产过程》,吉林大学博士学位论文.
  • 6程朝阳.法庭调解话语与权力研究[J].法律适用,2009(7):39-43. 被引量:7
  • 7BruceL. Hay, Settlement of Litigation,[美]皮特.纽曼主编.《新帕尔格雷夫法经济学大辞典》(第三卷),北京:法律出版社,2003年,第503页.
  • 8陈力.民事调解高反悔率及其解释[J].法律适用,2010(7):59-62. 被引量:27
  • 9龙宗智.关于“大调解”和“能动司法”的思考[J].政法论坛,2010,28(4):98-105. 被引量:72
  • 10陈晓明.刑事和解的契约解说[J].江淮论坛,2010(5):108-115. 被引量:6

共引文献354

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部