摘要
目的:比较腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效。方法:选取2011年1月~2012年6月在我院救治的50例急性阑尾炎患者,随机平均分为观察组(腹腔镜手术)和对照组(传统开腹手术),分析比较两组手术的治疗效果。结果:两组患者疗效、并发症、术后排气时间、手术出血量、住院时间及手术疼痛评分相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组手术时间相比,无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎疗效显著,具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少和住院时间短等优点,是治疗急性阑尾炎较理想的手术方式。
Objective:To compare the laparoscopic and traditional open surgery in the treatment of acute appendicitis clinical curative effect.Methods:50 cases random average divided into the observation group(laparoscopic surgery) and control group(traditional open surgery),comparison surgery treatment effect.Results:Two groups of patients curative effect,complications,and postoperative exhaust time,operation amount of bleeding,length of hospital stay and surgical pain score compared,significant difference(P0.05);Two groups of operation time,compared with no statistical difference(P0.05).Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute appendicitis curative effect is distinct,has the virtues of small trauma,quick recovery,fewer complications and shorter hospitalization time.
出处
《中国医药导刊》
2012年第11期1918-1918,1920,共2页
Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词
腹腔镜手术
传统开腹手术
急性阑尾炎
疗效
Laparoscopic
Traditional open
Acute appendicitis
Curative effect