期刊文献+

头脑风暴法及其变式对创造性思维产出的影响 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 该研究着重探讨在中国文化背景下头脑风暴法的不同变式对大学生创造性思维产出的影响。在严格控制的实验室条件下,选取大学生被试180名,探讨方式控制(讨论式头脑风暴法、默写式头脑风暴法)和焦点控制(希望点列举、缺点列举、无要求)对创造性思维产出的影响。因变量(创造性思维的产出)从流畅性、灵活性、精细性和独特性这四个维度来衡量。通过该实验研究,得出以下结论:①默写式头脑风暴条件下创造性思维的产出在流畅性、精细性和独特性方面均高于讨论式头脑风暴法。②希望点列举条件下创造性思维的产出在精细性方面高于无要求组。
作者 张玲玲
出处 《校园心理》 2012年第6期379-381,共3页 Journal of Campus Life & Mental Health
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1水志国.头脑风暴法简介[J].学位与研究生教育,2003(1):44-44. 被引量:31
  • 2Mullen B, Johnson C, Salas E. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: a meta-analytic integration. Basic Appl Soc Psychol, 1991, 12(1): 3-23.
  • 3Collaros PA, Anderson LR. Effect of perceived expertness upon creativity of members of brainstorming groups. J Appl Psychol, 1969, 53(2): 159-163.
  • 4Diehl M, Straebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. J Pers Soci Psychol, 1987, 53 (3) : 497-509.
  • 5郑全全,李宏.面对面和计算机群体决策在观点产生上的比较[J].心理学报,2003,35(4):492-498. 被引量:12

二级参考文献9

  • 1Wang Z M, Xu L C. Studies on managerial psychology (in Chinese). In: Wang S, Lin Z X, Qing Q C ed. Psychological Science in China. Chiangchun: Ji Lin Education Press, 1997. 1055-1067(王重鸣,徐联仓.管理心理学研究. 见:王甦,林仲贤,荆其诚主编.中国心理科学.长春:吉林教育出版社,1997. 1055-1067)
  • 2Siegel J, Dubrovsky V, Kiesler S. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986,37(1): 157~187
  • 3McGuire T W, Kiesler S, Siegel J. Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52(5): 917~930
  • 4Kiesler S, Sproull L. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992, 52(1): 96~123
  • 5Lam S S, Schaubroeck J. Improving group decisions by better pooling information: a comparative advantage of group decision support systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(4): 565~573
  • 6Valacich S, Dennis R. Idea generation in computer-based groups: a new ending to an old story. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994, 57(3 ): 448~467
  • 7Beach L R. The psychology of decision making-people in organizations, Sage Publications, Inc, 1997. 133~135
  • 8Dennis R, Valacich S. Computer brainstorms: more heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(4): 531~537
  • 9Valacich S, Schwenk C. Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, 63(2): 158~173

共引文献41

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部