期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

应聘者的选拔标准识别能力对人事选拔效果的影响 被引量：3

The Impact of Candidates' Ability to Indentify Criteria on Personnel Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应聘者对选拔标准的识别能力(abilityto identify criteria,简写为ATIC)是指个体在参与测评的过程中,正确识别评价标准的能力,现有测量选拔标准识别能力变量的主要方式有被试自评和研究者评分两种。众多研究发现,选拔标准识别能力对应聘者的表现有促进作用,它可以解释选拔的预测效度并影响其结构效度。当公开选拔标准,提高透明度,消除选拔标准识别能力个体差异的影响之后,选拔的预测效度会降低,而且对应聘者的成绩和选拔的结构效度也有影响,但目前有关研究的结果并不统一。未来研究应关注选拔标准识别能力与其他构念的关系、完善测量方法、探索它在其他人事选拔手段中的作用,并继续考察改变选拔标准识别能力对人事选拔的影响。 The ability to identify criteria （ATIC） is defined as a person＇s ability to correctly identify the performance criteria in an evaluative situation. There are two ways of measuring ATIC currently, candidates self-report and rater scoring. Many researches have found that ATIC has a positive effect on candidates＇ performance, it explains the selection＇s criterion validity and influences the construct validity. When the criteria is exposed to candidates, the selection＇s transparency is enhanced and the impact of ATIC＇s individual differences is removed, resulting in the decrease of the selection＇s criterion validity, while the effect on candidates＇ performance and the construct validity is uncertain Future research should frame ATIC in the broader literature, improve its measurement, and explore ATIC＇s role in other selections and the effect of changing ATIC on personnel selections.
作者 许诺 徐建平 刘茜
机构地区 北京师范大学心理学院 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期2052-2060,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 选拔标准识别能力 人事选拔 选拔效度 the ability to identify criteria personnel selection validy of the selection
分类号 B841 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Melchers, K. G., Klehe, U. C., Richter, G. M., Kleinmann, M.,Konig, C. J., & Lievens, F. (2009). "I know what you want to know": The impact of interviewees' ability to identify criteria on interview performance and construct-related validity. Human Performance, 22(4), 355-374.
  • 2Jansen, A., Lievens, F., & Kleinmann, M. (2011). Do individual differences in perceiving situational demands moderate the relationship between personality and assessment center dimension ratings? Human Performance, 24(3), 231-250.
  • 3Alexander, C. N., Jr., & Gordon, W. K. (1971). Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. Sociometry, 34(1), 65-82.
  • 4Klehe, U. C., Konig, C. J., Richter, G. M., Kleinmann, M., & Melchers, K. G. (2008). Transparency in structured interviews: Consequences for construct and criterionrelated validity. Human Performance, 21(2), 107-137.
  • 5马欣川,张菡.评委印象匹配对面试决策影响的实证研究[J].心理科学,2010,33(5):1276-1279. 被引量：3

二级参考文献8

  • 1吴志明,张厚粲,杨立谦.结构化面试中的评分一致性问题初探[J].应用心理学,1997,3(2):8-14. 被引量：28
  • 2Judge T A, Higgins C A, & Cable D B. The employment interview: A review of recent research and recommendations for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 2000, 10 (4): 383-406.
  • 3Shackleton V. Newell S. Managerial selection: a comparative study of methods used in top British and French companies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1991, 64, 23- 36.
  • 4Posthuma R A, Morgeson F P, Campion M A, Beyond employment interview validity: A comprehensive narrative review of recent and trends over time. Personnel Psychology, 2002, 55, 1-81.
  • 5Dunegan K J. Framing, Cognitive Modes, and Image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993 , 62(1 ) :79 - 86.
  • 6Payne J W, Bettman J R, Johnson E L. The adaptive decision maker: Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 1993.
  • 7Adkins C L, Russell C J, Werbel J D. Judgment of fit in the selection process: The role of work value congruence. Personnel Psychology, 1994, 47:605-623.
  • 8黎恒.应聘者印象管理策略对考官评价影响的实证研究[J].人类工效学,2003,9(1):15-18. 被引量：29

共引文献2

同被引文献80

  • 1骆方,张厚粲.(2007).人格测验中作假的控制方法.心理学探析,27(4),78-82.
  • 2Anderson, S. L., Adams, G., & Plaut, V. C. (2008). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: The importance of attractiveness in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2), 352-368.
  • 3Baron, R. A. (1983). "Sweet smell of success"? The impact of pleasant artificial scents on evaluations of job applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 709- 713.
  • 4Barrick, M. R., Dustin, S. L., Giluk, T. L., Stewart, G. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Swider, B. W. (2012). Candidate charac- teristics driving initial impressions during rapport building Implications for employment interview validity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), 330-352.
  • 5Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S. W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1394-1411.
  • 6Barriek, M. R., Swider, B. W., & Stewart, G. L. (2010). Initial evaluations in the interview: Relationships withsubsequent interviewer evaluations and employment offers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1163-1172.
  • 7Behrend, T., Toaddy, S., Thompson, L. F., & Sharek, D. J. (2012). The effects of avatar appearance on interviewer ratings in virtual employment interviews. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2128-2133.
  • 8Bente, G., Leuschner, H., Issa, A. A., & Blascovich, J. J. (2010). The others: Universals and cultural specificities in the perception of status and dominance from nonverbal behavior. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(3), 762-777.
  • 9Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B, Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 253-267.
  • 10Borman, W. C, (1982), Validity of behavioral assessment for predicting military recruiter performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 3-9.

引证文献3

二级引证文献27

心理科学进展
2012年 第12期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部