观点采择：概念、操纵及其对群际关系的影响被引量：44

Perspective-taking:Concept,Manipulation and Its Impact on Intergroup Relations

下载PDF

导出

摘要观点采择是指个体从他人或他人所处情境出发,想象或推测他人观点与态度的心理过程。观点采择能积极或消极地影响群际关系。依照研究内容是否涉及群际互动,可以将前人研究分为静态研究与动态研究。静态研究中,观点采择可以通过自我—他人融合、不公正感知等中介机制影响群际关系。动态研究中,观点采择可能引发反应性自我中心主义与评价关注,进而影响群际关系。未来可以从观点采择的真实干预、对群际冲突感知的影响以及检验观点采择与群际关系的调节变量等角度深入研究。 Abstract： Perspective-taking is the psychological process of contemplating and inferring other＇ perspective. Perspective-taking could positively or negatively affect intergroup relation in certain conditions. Studies in this field can be categorized into static and dynamic approaches by whether experiment involves real intergroup interaction or not. In static approach, perspective-taking could bring positive change to intergroup relation, and such influence can be mediated by self-other merging or perceived injustice. In dynamic approach, perspective-taking can invoke reactive egoism and evaluation concern, which in turn, deteriorate intergroup relation. Future research should focus on the role of perspective-taking in real life intervention, perspective-taking in intergroup conflict context, and moderators between perspective-taking and intergroup relation. Key words： perspective-taking; intergroup relation; self-other merging; intergroup interaction

作者赵显刘力张笑笑向振东付洪岭

机构地区北京师范大学心理学院北京市应用实验心理重点实验室北京市威凯建设发展有限公司

出处《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期2079-2088,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71071021) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助

关键词观点采择群际关系自我-他人融合群际互动 perspective-taking intergroup relation self-other merging intergroup interaction

分类号 B849 [哲学宗教—应用心理学] C91 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献55

1孙炳海,苗德露,李伟健,张海形,徐静逸.大学生的观点采择与助人行为:群体关系与共情反应的不同作用[J].心理发展与教育,2011,27(5):491-497. 被引量：31
2Aberson, C. L., & Haag, S. C. (2007). Contact, perspective taking, and anxiety as predictors of stereotype endorsement, explicit attitudes, and implicit attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 179-201.
3Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social belaaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165-178.
4Batson, C. D. (2009). Two forms of perspective taking: Imagining how another feels and imagining how you would feel. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), The handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 266-279). New York: Psychology Press.
5Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751-758.
6Cadinu, M. R., & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring anddifferentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661-667.
7Caruso, E.M., Epley, N., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). The good, the bad, and the ugly of perspective taking in groups In E. A. Mannix & M. A. Neale (Series Eds.), and A. E. Tenbrunsel (Vol. Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Ethics and groups (Vol. 8, pp. 201-224). London: Elsevier.
8Cheng, Y., Lin, C. P., Liu, H. L., Hsu, Y. Y., Lim, K. E., Hung, D., et al. (2007). Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Current Biology, 17, 1708-1713.
9Cohen, T. R., & Insko, C. A. (2008). War and peace: Possible approaches to reducing intergroup conflict. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 87-93.
10Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empath. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85-95.

二级参考文献33

1Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). Empathy and Prosucia Behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91 - 119.
2Eisenberg, N. Adolescents' Sympathy, Demographic , Zhou, Q. , & Koller, S. ( 2001 ). Brazilian Prosocial Moral Judgment and Behavior: Relations to Perspective Taking, Gender-Role Orientation, and Characteristics. Child Development, 72 ( 2 ) , 518 - 534.
3Epley, N., Caruso, E. M., & Bazennan, M. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9l ( 5 ) , 872 - 889.
4Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). l'erspeetive-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8 (2) 109 - 124.
5Galinsky, A. D., Wang, C. S., & Ku, G. (2008). Perspcetive-takers behave more stereotypieally. Journal of Personality and Social Psychogy, 95(2) , 404 -419.
6Hein, G. , & Singer, T. (2008). I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 153 - 158.
7Hoffman, M. L. ( 2000). Empathy and moral development : Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8Ittyerah M., & Mahindra, K. (1990). Moral development arm its relation to perspetive taking ability. Psychology in the Devel-ping Societies, 2(2), 203 -216.
9Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Perception through a perspective-taking lens: Differential effects on judgment and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 792 -798.
10Lishner, D. A. (2000). The components of empathy: distinguishing between tenderness and sympathy. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertatior-, Unversity of Kansas.