摘要
针对高强度钢材焊接工字形截面轴心受压短柱的局部稳定性能,对9个Q460C工字形截面短柱进行轴心受压试验,分析试件局部屈曲应力、极限应力随板件宽厚比的变化规律,研究翼缘、腹板嵌固系数的取值。此外,将屈曲应力、极限应力试验结果与我国、美国和欧洲钢结构设计规范的相应设计计算结果进行对比分析,研究相应规范对于高强度钢材的适用性。结果表明:翼缘的嵌固系数可取为定值1.0,腹板的嵌固系数不宜取为定值;GB 50017—2003《钢结构设计规范》中关于高强度钢材工字形截面短柱的局部屈曲应力的计算结果是不合理的;AISC 360-05规范的极限应力计算值误差较大,但偏于保守;Eurocode 3规范的极限应力计算值与试验值较为接近,但大部分计算结果较试验值偏大。为此,建议提出新的公式计算工字形截面短柱的局部屈曲应力,而对Eurocode 3规范关于工字形截面短柱的极限应力计算公式进行修正,使其能适用于Q460C高强度钢材。
Aiming at the local buckling behavior of high strength steel welded I-section columns,9 axial compression tests of Q460C I-section stub columns were conducted.Based on the test results,the relation of buckling stress and ultimate stress of specimens with different width-to-thickness ratios were studied,and the clamping coefficients of flange and web were proposed.Besides,test results were compared with the corresponding design methods in Chinese,American and European steel structures design codes,to confirm whether the design methods can be used to calculate buckling stress and ultimate stress of Q460C I-section stub columns.The research work shows that the clamping coefficient of the flange is a fixed value 1.0,but web isn't a fixed value.The buckling stress of I-section stub columns achieved by the design method in the Chinese code is unreasonable.The ultimate stress achieved by the design method in the American code doesn't agree well with the test results,but it's conservative.The ultimate stress achieved by the design method in the European code agrees well with the test results,but it's probably unsafe.In addition,a new design method,which is in need of revision,is proposed to predict the buckling stress of Q460C I-section stub columns.The design method in the European code,which is in need of revision,is recommended to predict the ultimate stress of Q460 I-section stub columns.
出处
《建筑结构学报》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第12期20-30,共11页
Journal of Building Structures
基金
大连理工大学海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室开放基金项目(LP0901)