期刊文献+

框架-摇摆墙结构体系中连接节点试验研究 被引量:23

Experimental study of connections of frame-rocking wall system
原文传递
导出
摘要 框架-摇摆墙结构是一种新型的抗震结构体系,摇摆墙与框架相连的节点构造是实现该结构体系的关键技术之一。为了推广框架-摇摆墙结构的工程应用,针对框架-摇摆墙结构的特殊性能要求设计了连接节点,并进行了试验研究。试验采用带隔震支座的钢框架模拟具有大变形能力的框架,设计制作了2片钢筋混凝土摇摆墙,利用该连接节点将框架和摇摆墙连接起来,形成框架-摇摆墙结构。通过不同加载模式的拟静力试验,验证了连接节点实现摇摆墙转动能力的可行性,并采用变形集中系数DCF评价了采用该连接节点摇摆墙对框架-摇摆墙结构的控制效果。试验结果表明:该连接节点可使摇摆墙在面内和面外均具备0.04 rad的转动能力;摇摆墙可使结构层间位移角趋于一致,对避免结构层间变形集中有良好的控制作用。 Frame-rocking wall system is a novel seismic force resisting structural system,and the connections are critical to realize the system.To promote the engineering application of frame-rocking wall system,new connections were proposed,and a series of tests were conducted to investigate the performance of the connections.In the tests,a steel frame equipped with rubber isolators,which has large deformation capacity,was used to simulate the frame.Two concrete rocking walls were fabricated.A new type of connection was adopted to assemble the frame and concrete rocking walls.The tests mainly focused on the rotation capacity of the rocking wall with the novel connection and the associated controlling effects.Interstory concentration factor(DCF) was adopted to evaluate the controlling effects of rocking wall with the connections.The results suggest that the connections ensure the rocking wall of a rotation capacity of 0.04rad both in-plane and out-of-plane.The rocking wall with the novel connections effectively controls the interstory drift concentration and endows the structure with a uniform deformation mode when subjected to different loading patterns.
出处 《建筑结构学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期38-46,共9页 Journal of Building Structures
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(51178250) 清华大学自主科研项目(2010Z01001) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金课题(20110002110091) 住房和城乡建设部2011中美合作专题项目(20111018)
关键词 钢框架结构 摇摆墙 节点 拟静力试验 变形能力 层间位移角 控制效果 steel frame structure rocking wall connection quasi-static test deformation capacity interstory drift controlling effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1曲哲,和田章,叶列平.摇摆墙在框架结构抗震加固中的应用[J].建筑结构学报,2011,32(9):11-19. 被引量:76
  • 2曹海韵,潘鹏,叶列平.基于推覆分析混凝土框架摇摆墙结构抗震性能研究[J].振动与冲击,2011,30(11):240-244. 被引量:34
  • 3Panian L, Steyer M, Tipping S. Post-tensioned concrete walls for seismic resistance: an innovative approach to earthquake safety and concrete construction in buildings [ J ]. Journal of the Post-Tensioning Institute, 2007,5 ( 1 ) :7-16.
  • 4Wada A, Qu Z, Ito H, Motoyui S, Sakata H, Kasai K. Seismic retrofit using rocking walls and steel dampers [ C/CD]. Proceedings of the ATC/SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures. NO. 1010. San Francisco, CA: ATC, 2009.
  • 5Ji X, Kato M, Wang T, et al. Effect of gravity columns on mitigation of drift concentration for braced frames [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(12) : 2148-2156.
  • 6Mark Stevenson, Leo Panian, Mike Korolyk, David Mar. Post-tensioned concrete walls and frames for seismic resistance: a case study of the david brower center [ C ]. Proceedings of Structural Engineers Association of California 2008 Convention. Berkeley, CA : SEAOC, 2008 : 1-8.
  • 7Midorikawa N, Azuhata T, Ishihara T, et al. Earthquake response reduction of buildings by rocking structural systems [ C ].Smart Structures and Materials 2002 : Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways. San Diego, CA: SHE, 2002: 265-272.
  • 8Deierlein G, Ma X, Eatherton M, et al. Collaborative research on development of innovative steel braced frame systems with controlled rocking and replaceable fuses[ C ]. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: CUEE, 2009:413-416.
  • 9Marriott D, Pampanin S, Bull D, Palermo A. Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions[J]. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 41(2) : 90-103.
  • 10周颖,吕西林.摇摆结构及自复位结构研究综述[J].建筑结构学报,2011,32(9):1-10. 被引量:219

二级参考文献53

  • 1FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
  • 2FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 3FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
  • 4Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
  • 5Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
  • 6Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
  • 7Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 8Hukelbridge A A. Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/23. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 9Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11 (3) : 141-150.
  • 10Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the shortcomings of design guidelines [ R ]. Report No. PEER-01/07. Bekeley : University of California, Berkeley. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2001.

共引文献290

同被引文献192

引证文献23

二级引证文献131

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部